Surgical Decision Making for the Elderly Patients in Severe Head Injuries.
10.3340/jkns.2014.55.4.195
- Author:
Kyeong Seok LEE
1
;
Jae Jun SHIM
;
Seok Man YOON
;
Jae Sang OH
;
Hack Gun BAE
;
Jae Won DOH
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea. ksleens@sch.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Prognosis;
Decision making;
Patient participation;
Craniocerebral trauma
- MeSH:
Aged*;
Brain Injuries;
Coma;
Craniocerebral Trauma*;
Decision Making*;
Humans;
Medical Records;
Missions and Missionaries;
Mortality;
Patient Participation;
Prognosis;
Pupil;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2014;55(4):195-199
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Age is a strong predictor of mortality in traumatic brain injuries. A surgical decision making is difficult especially for the elderly patients with severe head injuries. We studied so-called 'withholding a life-saving surgery' over a two year period at a university hospital. METHODS: We collected data from 227 elderly patients. In 35 patients with Glasgow Coma Score 3-8, 28 patients had lesions that required operation. A life-saving surgery was withheld in 15 patients either by doctors and/or the families (Group A). Surgery was performed in 13 patients (Group B). We retrospectively examined the medical records and radiological findings of these 28 patients. We calculated the predicted probability of 6 month mortality (IPM) and 6 month unfavorable outcome (IPU) to compare the result of decision by the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) calculator. RESULTS: Types of the mass lesion did not affect on the surgical decision making. None of the motor score 1 underwent surgery, while all patients with reactive pupils underwent surgery. Causes of injury or episodes of hypoxia/hypotension might have affected on the decision making, however, their role was not distinct. All patients in the group A died. In the group B, the outcome was unfavorable in 11 of 13 patients. Patients with high IPM or IPU were more common in group A than group B. Wrong decisions brought futile cares. CONCLUSION: Ethical training and developing decision-making skills are necessary including shared decision making.
