Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Non-Ampullary Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Author:
Da-Bin JEONG
1
;
Sang-Gyun KIM
;
Soo-Jeong CHO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research 2025;25(1):54-63
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objectives:Although non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NADNETs) are rare neoplasms, their incidence has been increasing. In this study, we aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients with NADNETs who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) or surgery.
Methods:This retrospective study included 55 adults (aged 26–78 years) diagnosed with NADNETs between 2009 and 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital. We categorized the patients into 3 groups: 21 underwent ER, 28 underwent surgical resection, and 6 had no detectable residual tumors after the initial biopsy during the follow-up period. Continuous data were examined using the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests.
Results:A total of 21 patients, with a mean tumor size of 9.2±5.3 mm, underwent successful ER. After ER, three patients experienced perforation (14% [3/21]); two underwent primary repair surgery, and one recovered with conservative treatment. The mean tumor size of 28 patients who underwent surgical resection was 13.9±6.7 mm. There were no cases of postoperative bleeding or perforation; however, four patients experienced ileus and required prolonged hospital stays. The median follow-up periods for patients who underwent ER, surgical resection, and removal after the initial biopsy were 42, 48, and 42.5 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, no recurrence was observed in any group.
Conclusions:Recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing ER for NADNETs, with an endoscopically measured size of approximately 10 mm, was comparable to that of patients undergoing surgical resection. However, ER carried a relatively high risk of perforation due to the challenging anatomical access and thin duodenal wall.
