Research on proactive pharmaceutical service model of discharge medication order review and medication education under resident pharmacist system
- VernacularTitle:驻科药师制度下主动式出院带药医嘱审核和用药教育服务模式研究
- Author:
Wenxu SUN
1
;
Xinyue YOU
1
;
Xian JIANG
1
;
Fengbo WU
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy，West China Hospital of Sichuan University，Chengdu 610041，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
resident pharmacist;
pharmaceutical services;
discharge medication;
order review;
medication education
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(10):1243-1247
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To develop a pharmaceutical service model for discharge medication order review and medication education （hereinafter referred to as the “proactive pharmaceutical service model”）， and evaluate its effects. METHODS The data of discharged patients were collected retrospectively from Rheumatology and Immunology Department of our hospital during January to June 2023 and January to June 2024. Patients discharged from January to June 2024 were classified as the intervention group （489 cases）， while patients discharged from January to June 2023 were classified as the control group （535 cases） based on the different pharmaceutical service models they received. The control group received traditional service model， and the intervention group additionally got proactive pharmaceutical service model based on the control group. The primary outcome measures [the number of discharge medications， the number of medication errors， and the occurrence of adverse drug-drug interaction （DDI）] and follow-up outcome measures （the adjustment of medication regimen due to intolerance， unplanned hospital admissions， and proactive seeking of pharmaceutical services after discharge） were compared between the two groups. The discharge medication order review status， the occurrence of adverse DDI in patients with polypharmacy， and bedside medication education status for patients receiving the proactive pharmaceutical service model were all recorded. RESULTS From January to June 2024， a total of 1 052 discharge medication order review for inpatients were reviewed， and 174 instances of medication errors were identified. Polypharmacy was observed in 579 patients， with an incidence rate of 55.04%. The incidence of adverse DDI was significantly higher in patients with polypharmacy compared to those without polypharmacy （P＜0.001）. Pharmacists completed medication guidance for 394 instances of high-risk patients prone to the incidence rate of medication errors at home. The number of discharge medications， the incidence rate of medication errors， instances of medication not matching the diagnosis， dosage and administration errors， adverse DDI， and the incidence rate of patients who required adjustment of medication regimen due to intolerance were all significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group （P＜0.05）. Additionally， the incidence rate of patients who proactive seeking of pharmaceutical services after discharge was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group （P＜0.05）. However， there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of unplanned hospital admissions between the two groups （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS The established proactive pharmaceutical service model can reduce medication errors， enhance patient recognition of pharmaceutical services， and ensure medication safety for discharged patients at home.
