Rapid health technology assessment of tirzepatide for diabetes mellitus type 2 and long-term weight management
- VernacularTitle:替尔泊肽用于2型糖尿病和长期体重管理的快速卫生技术评估
- Author:
Zeyu XIE
1
;
Yinuo LIU
2
;
Zhuoru LIANG
1
;
Yaohua CAO
1
;
Guimei ZHENG
1
;
Weiling CAO
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy,Shenzhen Luohu District People’s Hospital,Shenzhen 518000,China
2. School of Public Health,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
tirzepatide;
diabetes mellitus type 2;
obesity;
rapid health technology assessment
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(9):1141-1146
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide for diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and long-term weight management, and provide evidence-based basis for clinical drug treatment and health insurance policy formulation. METHODS Computer searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and health technology assessment (HTA) official website from their inception to October 1st 2024 to collect HTA report, systematic review/ meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic study on tirzepatide for the treatment of T2DM or for weight management. After data extraction and quality evaluation, descriptive analysis was performed on the research results. RESULTS Totally 18 papers were included, including 14 systematic reviews/meta-analyses and 4 pharmacoeconomics studies, and no HTA report was retrieved. In terms of efficacy, most results showed that the tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg were significantly better than other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin, body weight, and waist circumference (P<0.05). In terms of safety, compared with other GLP-1 receptor agonists, tirzepatide did not increase the incidence of gastrointestinal-related adverse events (AE), the incidence of AE of grade ≥3, or the incidence of severe hypoglycemia (P>0.05). However, tirzepatide 15 mg may significantly increased the incidence of hypoglycemia and the rate of discontinuation due to adverse reactions (P< 0.05). In terms of cost-effectiveness, based on the background of foreign pharmacoeconomic studies, tirzepatide was more cost- effective compared to semaglutide and liraglutide in the treatment of T2DM or for weight management. CONCLUSIONS Tirzepatide at doses of 10 mg and 15 mg has good efficacy and safety for the treatment of T2DM and for long-term weight management. However, when using the 15 mg dose of tirzepatide, close monitoring is required due to the risk of hypoglycemia and discontinuation due to adverse reactions it may pose. Based on pharmacoeconomic studies conducted abroad results, tirzepatide exhibits economic advantages.