Study on the effect and safety of ciprofol combined with local anesthesia on elderly patients undergoing hemor-rhoidectomy
- VernacularTitle:环泊酚复合局麻用于老年患者痔疮切除术的效果及安全性研究
- Author:
Jiahui FENG
1
;
Helin ZOU
2
;
Fujun LI
3
Author Information
1. Ruikang Clinical Medical College，Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine，Nanning 530200，China
2. Dept. of Anesthesiology，Mianyang Chinese Medicine Hospital，Sichuan Mianyang 621000，China
3. Dept. of Anesthesiology，Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine，Nanning 530011，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
ciprofol;
etomidate;
hemorrhoidectomy;
oxidative stress;
elderly patients
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(8):970-974
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect and safety of ciprofol combined with local anesthesia on elderly patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS A total of 108 elderly patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy at the Department of Proctology， Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine from February 2023 to June 2024， were included. The patients were randomly divided into the etomidate group （54 cases） and the ciprofol group （54 cases） based on a computer-generated random sequence. One patient with intraoperative bleeding and one who refused postoperative examination were excluded， resulting in a final total of 106 patients completing this trial （52 in the etomidate group and 54 in the ciprofol group）. The two groups of patients underwent hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia with sedative assistance， receiving either etomidate at 0.2 mg/kg or ciprofol at 0.3 mg/kg combined with sufentanil at 0.1 μg/kg. The sedation success rate， induction time， recovery time， operation time and hemodynamic parameters [heart rate （HR）， mean arterial pressure （MAP）， pulse oxygen saturation （SpO2） and respiratory rate （RR）] were observed at baseline （T0）， after successful induction of anesthesia （T1）， 10 minutes after the start of surgery （T2）， and awakening （T3）. Additionally， the levels of oxidative stress markers [malondialdehyde （MDA） and superoxide dismutase （SOD）] were measured at T0， T2 and T3. The occurrence of adverse reactions was also recorded. RESULTS The induction time of the ciprofol group was significantly shorter than that of the etomidate group （P＜0.05）， while the recovery time was significantly longer in the ciprofol group compared to the etomidate group （P＜0.05）. AtT1 and T2， HR， MAP and RR of two groups were significantly lower compared to the same group at T0 （P＜0.05）. However， no significant differences were observed in the hemodynamic parameters at each time point between the two groups （P＞0.05）. At T2 and T3， the MDA levels in both groups were significantly higher than at T0， while the SOD levels were significantly lower than the same group at T0； the ciprofol group showed significantly better outcomes than the etomidate group at the same time points （P＜0.05）. The proportion of patients with intraoperative somatic movements was significantly lower in the ciprofol group compared to the etomidate group （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS When ciprofol is used in elderly patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy， it demonstrates certain advantages over etomidate in maintaining hemodynamic stability and reducing oxidative stress. Additionally， ciprofol has higher safety.
