Correlation between gross tumor volume and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiotherapy
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20240702-00323
- VernacularTitle:食管癌放疗大体肿瘤区体积与患者预后的相关性分析
- Author:
Zhetao MI
1
;
Qi LI
;
Yaqin ZHENG
;
Dan GUO
Author Information
1. 山西省肿瘤医院 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院山西医院 山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院放射治疗科，太原 030013
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms;
Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated;
Gross tumor volume;
Prognosis
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2024;36(10):757-761
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the correlation between gross tumor volume (GTV) and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 130 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who received radiotherapy at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from February 2016 to June 2018 were analyzed. All patients underwent conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal lesions. Pinnacle planning system was used to calculate GTV, and GTV classification was performed: GTV ≤ 30 cm 3 was classified as grade Ⅰ, GTV > 30 cm 3 and ≤ 60 cm 3 was classified as grade Ⅱ, and GTV > 60 cm 3 was classified as grade Ⅲ. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients, and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of poor PFS and OS. Results:The median age of 130 patients [ M ( Q1, Q3)] was 59 years old (56 years old, 69 years old), with 90 males and 40 females; Karnofsky performance scores were all ≥ 70 points; tumors were located in the neck in 10 cases, upper chest in 34 cases, middle chest in 55 cases, and lower chest in 31 cases; clinical staging for esophageal carcinoma treated with non-surgical methods: 3 cases in stage Ⅰ, 37 cases in stage Ⅱ, 79 cases in stage Ⅲ, and 11 cases in stage Ⅳ; 25 cases were classified as GTV grade Ⅰ, 62 cases as GTV grade Ⅱ, and 43 cases as GTV grade Ⅲ. The 1-year PFS rate of 130 patients was 55%, the 2-year PFS rate was 19%, and the median PFS time was 14 months; the 1-year OS rate was 76%, the 2-year OS rate was 32%, and the median OS time was 20 months. PFS and OS of patients in stages Ⅰ+Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ deteriorated sequentially, and the differences between the three groups were statistically significant (both P < 0.001); the PFS and OS of patients with GTV grades Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ deteriorated sequentially, and the differences in PFS and OS between the three groups were statistically significant (both P < 0.001); there were no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS among patients of different genders, ages, and tumor locations (all P > 0.05). The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high clinical staging (stage Ⅳ vs. stage Ⅰ, HR = 8.34, 95% CI: 3.88-17.94, P < 0.001) and high GTV grading (grade Ⅱ vs. grade Ⅰ: HR = 6.81, 95% CI: 3.39-13.67, P < 0.001; grade Ⅲ vs. grade Ⅰ: HR = 23.97, 95% CI: 10.81-53.14, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for poor PFS; high clinical staging (stage Ⅳ vs. stage Ⅰ: HR = 9.94, 95% CI: 4.50-21.97, P < 0.001) and high GTV grading (grade Ⅱ vs. grade Ⅰ: HR = 13.55, 95% CI: 5.58-32.91, P < 0.001; grade Ⅲ vs. grade Ⅰ: HR = 35.01, 95% CI: 13.57-90.34, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for poor OS. Conclusions:GTV is associated with the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
