Efficacy comparison of transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm and traditional thoracoabdominal combination surgical approach for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20230407-00171
- VernacularTitle:经腹打开左侧膈肌与传统胸腹联合手术入路治疗SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部腺癌效果比较
- Author:
Yu LI
1
;
Hao LEI
;
Quan NIU
;
Xiaogang BI
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学第五临床医学院，太原 030012
- Keywords:
Adenocarcinoma;
Esophagogastric junction;
Siewert type Ⅱ;
Surgical approach;
Prognosis
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2024;36(5):365-370
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm and traditional thoracoabdominal combination approach for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 59 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent radical total gastrectomy in Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and all patients were divided into the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group (30 cases) and the thoracoabdominal combination group (29 cases) according to surgical access. The general data, perioperative indexes, postoperative complications and postoperative survival of patients in the two groups were compared. Factors influencing the overall survival were analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards model.Results:The differences in terms of gender, age, tumor diameter, pT staging, and pN staging between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). The length of esophageal invasion was (3.5±1.1) cm and (3.7±1.1) cm, respectively in the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group and the thoracoabdominal combination group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( t = -0.70, P = 0.486). Compared with the thoracoabdominal combination group, the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group had less operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bedtime, chest tube extraction time and postoperative hospitalization days, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05); the differences in the number of lymph nodes cleared, the number of positive lymph nodes, the number of thoracic lymph node dissection, and the number of positive thoracic lymph node were not statistically significant in the two groups (all P > 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group and the thoracoabdominal combination group were 53.3% (16/30) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 2.30, P = 0.130), while the incidence of lung infection and pleural effusion in the thoracoabdominal combination group was higher than that in the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group (both P<0.05). The 1- and 3-year postoperative overall survival rates were 80.0%, 63.3% in the transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm group, and 79.3%, 62.1% in the thoracoabdominal combination group, respectively, and the difference in overall survival between the two groups was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.934). Multivariate analysis showed that pT staging ( HR = 4.009, 95% CI: 1.851-8.683, P < 0.001) and pN staging ( HR = 2.338, 95% CI: 1.435-3.811, P = 0.001) were the independent influencing factors of overall survival. Conclusions:For patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with esophageal invasion length > 3 cm, transabdominal opening of the left diaphragm approach can reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative chest complications, and it has the advantages of shorter operation, hospitalization time, and less trauma, which can help to accelerate the recovery of the patients; pT and pN staging are the independent factors influencing the prognosis of patients.
