Efficacy and safety comparison of azacitidine combined with venetoclax or CAG regimen in the treatment of newly treated elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20231206-00223
- VernacularTitle:阿扎胞苷联合维奈克拉或CAG方案治疗老年初治急性髓系白血病患者效果和安全性比较
- Author:
Wenjun GE
1
;
Songyu GE
;
Xiangchen ZHANG
;
Xia LI
;
Li WANG
;
Jianyu DUAN
;
Jing YANG
;
Yidong MA
Author Information
1. 大同市第五人民医院血液科，大同 037009
- Keywords:
Acute, myeloid, leukemia;
Aged;
Azacitidine;
Venetoclax;
CAG regimen;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2024;36(5):356-360
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of azacitidine combined with venetoclax or CAG regimen in the treatment of newly treated elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 34 newly treated elderly patients with AML treated in the Fifth People's Hospital of Datong from May 2018 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, all patients were divided into venetoclax group (azacitidine + venetoclax, 17 cases) and CAG group (azacitidine + CAG regimen, 17 cases). The clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy, adverse reactions and survival of the both groups were compared.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical data of both groups (all P > 0.05). The complete remission (CR) rate and the objective response rate (ORR) in venetoclax group were higher than those in CAG group [CR: 70.6%(12/17) vs. 47.1% (8/17); ORR: 82.4% (14/17) vs. 64.7% (11/17)],while the differences in CR and ORR were not statistically significant (χ 2 = 2.00, P = 0.163; χ 2 = 2.00, P = 0.244). The follow-up time[ M ( Q1, Q3)] was 25.4 months (7.2 months, 60.3 months). At the end of follow-up, 19 of 34 patients survived (13 cases in venetoclax group and 6 cases in CAG group); 15 died (4 cases in venetoclax group and 11 cases in CAG group). The median overall survival (OS) time was 14.22 months (95% CI: 8.2-60.3 months) and 10.56 months (95% CI: 7.2-50.2 months), respectively in venetoclax group and CAG group;the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 9.97 months (95% CI: 5.4-40.5 months) and 6.82 months (95% CI: 5.0-36.2 months), respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences in OS and PFS between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Grade 3-4 hematological adverse reactions occurred in 16 and 14 patients in venetoclax group and CAG group, respectively. There were no significant differences in granulocyte deficiency time, platelet deficiency time, infection and bleeding incidence between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions:Azacitidine combined with venetoclax or CAG regimen have better clinical efficacy and safety for newly treated elderly patients with AML.
