Construction of a selection method for supporting institutions of national clinical medical research centers based on third-party evaluation data
10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20230907-00127
- VernacularTitle:基于第三方评价数据的国家临床医学研究中心依托单位遴选方法构建
- Author:
Yan MU
1
;
Youqin HE
;
Nan WEN
;
Kuimeng SONG
;
Min WU
Author Information
1. 山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院）医疗保障学院，济南 250117
- Keywords:
National clinical medical research center;
Evaluation studies;
Supporting institutions;
Scientific and technological evaluation metrics;
Standardized valu
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2024;40(5):374-379
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the method of selecting the supporting institutions of the national clinical medical research center by using the third-party evaluation data.Methods:Select disease fields/clinical specialties as research objects based on the criteria of having at least 5 national clinical research centers established in the field of major diseases and at least 3 established in the field of non major diseases. Collected data on the ranking of scientific and technological evaluation metrics in Chinese hospitals from the official website of the Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and collected standardized research value ranking data on the reputation ranking of Chinese hospitals and specialties from the official website of Fudan University. Based on the correspondence between the disease field/clinical specialty and the disciplines and specialties in the two major rankings, the top 5 and top 10 hospitals in the corresponding disease fields/clinical specialties in the two ranking lists were selected respectively, and the comprehensive scores of the included hospitals were calculated using the grade scoring method and ranked accordingly. Then, determine the number of hospitals to be selected based on the criteria of fully covering the recognized national clinical medical research centers supporting institutions.Results:The study focused on six disease fields/clinical specialties, including chronic kidney disease, obstetrics and gynecology, digestive system diseases, oral diseases, hematological diseases, and eye, ear, nose, and throat diseases. In the hospital ranking list formed by the top 5 hospitals included in the two rankings, a maximum of 11 hospitals needed to be included to fully cover the recognized supporting institutions, while in the hospital ranking list formed by the top 10 hospitals included in the rankings, a maximum of 6 hospitals needed to be included to achieve full coverage. Therefore, the optimal selection method was to include the top 10 hospitals in the two rankings and calculate their comprehensive scores, and select the top 6 hospitals based on their comprehensive scores.Conclusions:The selection method based on the third-party evaluation data is scientific and reliable, and can provide reference for the evaluation work of the management department of the national clinical medical research center.
