Comparison of endoscopic and intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal bleeding combined with portal vein thrombosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20240228-00106
- VernacularTitle:内镜与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗静脉曲张出血合并门静脉血栓的对比研究
- Author:
Wei WU
1
;
Zihao CAI
;
Chao CHEN
;
Ming ZHANG
;
Feng ZHANG
;
Qin YIN
;
Yuzheng ZHUGE
;
Jiangqiang XIAO
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属第一医院消化内科，温州 325000
- Keywords:
Esophageal and gastric varices;
Portosystemic shunt, transjugular intrahepatic;
Portal vein thrombosis;
Endoscopic treatment;
Sclerotherapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2024;41(8):606-613
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic treatment for liver cirrhosis with esophageal gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT).Methods:A total of 183 liver cirrhosis patients with EGVB and PVT in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were selected from January 2017 to December 2019, and 66 patients were assigned to the endoscopic group (received endoscopi treatment) and 117 the TIPS group (received TIPS treatment). Propensity score matching was performed according to the 1∶1 ratio, yielding 58 patients in each group for analysis, with a median follow-up time of 36 months in both groups. Postoperative survival, postoperative rebleeding rate, and postoperative hepatic encephalopathy incidence were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Results:During the follow-up, the rebleeding rate in the endoscopic group was significantly higher [39.7% (23/58) VS 17.2% (10/58), P=0.005], and the TIPS group had a higher incidence of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy [29.3% (17/58) VS 13.8% (8/58), P=0.048], and no significant difference in survival rate was observed between the two groups [74.1% (43/58) VS 75.9% (44/58), P=0.769]. In the subgroup analysis of mild degree of PVT, there was no significant difference in survival [88.0% (22/25) VS 72.0% (18/25), P=0.164], rebleeding rate [28.0% (7/25) VS 12.0% (3/25), P=0.164], or incidence of hepatic encephalopathy [8.0% (2/25) VS 20.0% (5/25), P=0.202] between the endoscopic group and the TIPS group. In the subgroup analysis of severe degree of PVT, the rebleeding rate in the endoscopic group was significantly higher than that in the TIPS group [48.5% (16/33) VS 21.2% (7/33), P=0.010], while there was no significant difference in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy [18.2% (6/33) VS 36.4% (12/33), P=0.133], or the survival rate [63.6% (21/33) VS 78.8% (26/33), P=0.154]. Conclusion:For liver cirrhosis patients with mild PVT and EGVB, combining endoscopic therapy with anticoagulation may be superior to TIPS. Conversely, in patients with severe PVT, TIPS may be a more suitable option due to a significantly reduced rebleeding risk without a notable increase in hepatic encephalopathy incidence.
