Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.589
- Author:
Dalsan YOU
1
;
In Gab JEONG
;
Choung Soo KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cskim@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Prostatectomy;
Prostatic neoplasms;
Risk assessment
- MeSH:
Biopsy;
Humans;
Incidence;
Neoplasm Grading;
Prostate;
Prostate-Specific Antigen;
Prostatectomy;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Assessment;
Survival Rate
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2010;51(9):589-595
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
High-risk localized prostate cancer traditionally includes patients with clinical T3 disease but also includes those with apparently localized disease but with adverse prognostic factors such as a Gleason score of 8 to 10, prostate-specific antigen of more than 20 ng/ml, or extensive disease on biopsy. In the past, these patients were treated primarily with radiation therapy due to concerns that surgery was not likely to be curative and was associated with a high incidence of side-effects. In addition, the lack of randomized trials comparing curative treatments for high-risk prostate cancer makes treatment decisions in this patient population difficult. Several retrospective series have reported the long-term efficacy of radical prostatectomy monotherapy in a high-risk population, showing that the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was more than 80% and the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was about 50%. In addition, comparisons of different treatment options by means of nonrandomized trials have shown improved outcomes with surgery compared with radiation therapy or observation. Thus, there is renewed interest in radical prostatectomy as the primary treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Here, we reviewed the outcomes of radical prostatectomy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies, in high-risk patients and what is known about the choice and timing of adjuvant therapies.