Constructing an evaluation index system of primary practice bases for standardized training of assistant general practitioners in Beijing
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20240126-00062
- VernacularTitle:北京市助理全科医师规范化培训基层实践基地评估指标体系的构建研究
- Author:
Haijin LI
1
;
Hui LI
;
Mingyang LIANG
;
Chenli ZHU
;
Shuang SHAO
;
Juan DU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院，北京 100069
- Keywords:
Questionnaires;
Delphi technique;
Inservice training;
Evaluation study;
General practitioners
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2024;23(6):633-640
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct an evaluation index system of primary practice bases for standardized training of assistant general practitioners in Beijing.Methods:From September to December 2023, the evaluation index system was initially developed using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP model), then 20 experts engaged in clinical teaching management and general practice standardized training base evaluation were invited for three rounds of Delphi expert consultation, and the weights of the indicators at all levels were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Results:The response rates of the three rounds of expert consultation were 100.0%, 95.0%, and 95.0% respectively. The degree of authority of the expert consultations was greater than 0.70. The index importance and feasibility coordination coefficients of three rounds of expert consultation were 0.123 and 0.100 ( P<0.001), 0.064 and 0.068 ( P>0.05), and 0.149 and 0.221 ( P<0.001), respectively, indicting the convergence of the experts′ opinions. The evaluation indexes of the primary practice bases for standardized training of assistant general practitioners in Beijing were finally constructed, including five first-level indexes, including qualification and conditions, teaching organization and system, teaching staff, operation management and quality control; 11 second-level indexes, including basic conditions, department setup, teaching facilities, teaching organization and teaching system; and 25 third-level indexes, including qualification, scale, essential departments, conditional departments and basic teaching facilities. The weights of the five first-level indexes were qualification and conditions (0.333), teaching organization and system (0.167), teaching staff (0.167), operation management (0.167), quality control (0.167). Among the 11 second-level indexes, the top five weights were basic conditions (0.163), department setup (0.104), teaching organization (0.084), teacher requirements (0.084), and basic practice rotation management (0.084). Among the 25 third-level indexes, the top five weights were qualification (0.083), quality control process (0.082), scale (0.081), essential departments (0.053), and conditional departments (0.051). Conclusion:The evaluation index system of primary practice bases for standardized training of assistant general practitioners in Beijing has been constructed in this study based on Delphi expert consultations.
