Characteristics, outcomes and its relative risk factors in elderly recipients of heart transplantation: a single-center experience
10.3760/cma.j.cn421203-20230726-00034
- VernacularTitle:老龄原位心脏移植受者的特点、预后及其相关影响因素单中心分析
- Author:
Shanshan ZHENG
1
;
Zhe ZHENG
;
Jie HUANG
;
Zhongkai LIAO
;
Lin ZHANG
;
Xiaonan FANG
;
Sheng LIU
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院阜外医院心脏外科，北京 100037
- Keywords:
Heart transplantation;
The aged;
Survival analysis;
Risk factors
- From:
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
2024;45(3):167-174
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the trends and outcomes for heart transplantation (HT) in elderly recipients and further examine the related risk factors.Methods:Between June 2004 and December 2021, retrospective review was conducted for the relevant clinical data and age distribution of 1044 HT recipients aged ≥18 year at Fuwai Hospital. The study population was assigned into two groups of elder (≥60 year, n=877) and non-elder (<60 year, n=157). Subgroup analysis was made between recipients aged <65 year (n=107) and those aged ≥ 65 year (n=50) in elder group. Baseline demographic profiles, clinical data, in-hospital and one-year post-transplant mortality and long-term survival were compared between two groups. Then a further comparison of long-term survival was conducted among the groups of non-elder, elder aged <65 year and elder aged ≥65 year. Cox proportional risk regression and multivariate Logistic regression models were utilized for examining the relevant risk factors for cumulative survival rate and short-term mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed for plotting survival curves and Log-rank test for comparison. Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model was utilized for examining the relevant risk factors for cumulative survival rate and multivariate Logistic regression model for analyzing the relevant risk factors for short-term mortality. After adjusting for other confounding factors, the impact of recipient age on survival post-HT was determined.Results:The number of elderly HT recipients spiked annually at our center while average age of adult recipients and average age of elderly recipients have remained relatively constant. The median follow-up period was 6.5 years. Regarding baseline data, statistically significant differences existed in ratio of males [84.7%(113/157) vs 77.5%(687/877)], hypertension history [20.4%(32/157) vs 8.9%(79/877)], smoking history [47.1%(74/157) vs 36.1%(320/877)], diabetic history [33.8%(53/157) vs 14.7%(130/877)], preoperative ICD/CRT/CRT-D implantation [28.0%(44/157) vs 18.0%(160/877)], value of creatinine [(105.3±25.3) vs (96.8±35.0) μmol/L], IMPACT score [(6.9±2.4) vs (4.2±2.9) point], serum total bilirubin [19.7(13.6, 30.3) vs 23.7(15.8, 36.8) μmol/L], mean pulmonary arterial pressure [(26.0±10.3) vs (29.7±11.0) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)] and ischemic duration [(274.7±105.6) vs (296.0±120.4) min] (all P<0.05). No significant inter-group difference existed in in-hospital mortality [4.5%(7/157) vs 4.7%(42/887)] or 1-year mortality [5.7%(9/157) vs 6.5%(58/887)] ( P=0.88, P=0.70); in-hospital mortality and 1-year postoperative mortality of recipients aged ≥65 years 10.0%(5/50) and 14.0%(7/50) were both higher than those aged <65 year [1.9%(2/107), 1.9%(2/107)]. The differences were both statistically significant ( P=0.02, P<0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that long-term survival rate was lower in elder group than that in non-elder group and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.046). Long-term survival rate of elders aged ≥65 year was lower than that of non-elders aged <65 year and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.01). Regression analysis indicated that age of recipient ≥65 year, preoperative creatinine ≥133 μmol/L, preoperative total bilirubin ≥25.65 μmol/L and preoperative support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were independent risk factors for short/long-term mortality post-HT. Conclusion:Although long-term prognosis of elderly recipients is slightly worse than that of non-elderly ones, in-hospital mortality and one-year postoperative mortality are similar between two groups. For elderly recipients with fewer comorbidities and better preoperative status, they should not be excluded from HT based solely upon age. The long-term prognosis of recipients aged ≥65 year remains poor and HT decisions should be made carefully.
