Comparison of anesthetic potency of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil for colonoscopy in patients with different BMIs
10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20231120.00816
- VernacularTitle:右美托咪定复合瑞芬太尼用于不同BMI患者结肠镜检查术麻醉效力的比较
- Author:
Li JIA
1
;
Jingyu GUO
;
Jing ZHANG
;
Yan LIU
;
Meng XIE
;
Tong TONG
;
Yuying XING
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第四医院麻醉科，石家庄 050011
- Keywords:
Body weight changes;
Colonoscopy;
Visceral pain;
Dexmedetomidine;
Remifentanil;
Dose-response relationship, drug
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2024;44(8):981-984
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the anesthetic potency of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil for colonoscopy in the patients with different body mass indexes (BMIs) to assess the clinical significance of the influence of weight on the level of pain during the procedure.Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 18-64 yr, undergoing elective colonoscopy, were divided into 3 groups based on the BMI: group Ⅰ (underweight group, BMI<18.5 kg/m 2), group Ⅱ (normal weight group, BMI 18.5-24.0 kg/m 2), and group III (overweight group, 24.0 kg/m 2 < BMI <30.0 kg/m 2). The prescribed dose of dexmedetomidine was infused within 2 min, then remifentanil was infused as a bolus of 1 μg/kg within 2 min followed by an infusion of 0.1 μg · kg -1 · min -1 throughout the surgery, and then colonoscopy was performed in patients of each group. The up-and-down sequential allocation was used to determine the dose of dexmedetomidine, the initial dose of dexmedetomidine in each group was 0.3 μg/kg, and the ratio between the two successive doses was 1.2. The positive response was defined as the Modified Observer′s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score > 1 and occurrence of body movement during the operation. Each time the dose of dexmedetomidine increased/decreased in the next patient depending on whether or not the response was positive. The median effective dose (ED 50) and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of dexmedetomidine were calculated using the Dixon-Massey formula. Results:Compared with group Ⅰ (0.42 [95% CI 0.38-0.47] μg/kg), the ED 50 of dexmedetomidine was significantly decreased in group II (0.23 [95% CI 0.19-0.32] μg/kg) and in group III (0.18 [95% CI 0.13-0.22] μg/kg) ( P<0.05). The ED 50 of dexmedetomidine was significantly decreased in group Ⅲ when compared with group Ⅱ ( P<0.05). Conclusions:With the increase of patients′ BMIs, the anesthetic potency of dexmedetomidine for colonoscopy is significantly enhanced when combined with remifentanil, indicating that clinicians should pay attention to the influence of weight on the level of pain during procedures.
