Analysis of current status of internet-based patient education materials on labor analgesia in China
10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20240313.00717
- VernacularTitle:我国分娩镇痛相关网络科普教育资料现状分析
- Author:
Lina YANG
1
;
Xiaojie WANG
;
Yan RUI
;
Yongqian ZHANG
;
Siyi TANG
;
Dong YU
;
Anshi WU
;
Changwei WEI
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院麻醉科，北京 100020
- Keywords:
Analgesia, obstetrical;
Health education;
Internet use;
Information quality
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2024;44(7):850-855
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the current status of internet-based patient education materials related to labor analgesia in China.Methods:Labor analgesia-related materials were retrieved and screened according to the search habits of Chinese search engine users. The coverage and accuracy of the content were evaluated by 3 anesthesiologists. The Chinese version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print Materials was used to subjectively assess comprehensibility and operability from a medical text perspective. The consistency of the evaluation results of the three anesthesiologists was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient method. A machine learning method combined with ChatGPT-4.0 was employed to establish a Chinese readability classification model to objectively evaluate the readability difficulty of the included materials from a Chinese text perspective.Results:A total of 97 web pages were retrieved, with 21 valid materials included in the study. The coverage rate of contraindications for labor analgesia was only 62% (13/21), and the accuracy rate of materials exceeding 90% was 71% (15/21). Internet-based materials that were easy to understand accounted for 81% (17/21), while the constituent ratio of internet-based materials with instructional significance were only 5% (1/21). The intraclass correlation coefficient values of consistency evaluation for coverage rate, accuracy rate, and comprehensibility and operability were 0.975, 0.833, 0.758, and 0.773, respectively ( P<0.001). Internet-based materials suitable for compulsory education level were only 5% (1/21), while those suitable for high school and above education level accounted for 43% (9/21). Conclusions:There are numerous internet-based patient education materials related to labor analgesia in China, but the quality needs improvement. In the future, a collaborative model of " anesthesiology+ linguistics" should be developed to provide patients with more comprehensive, accurate, and pregnant-friendly patient education materials.
