Application value of human epididymis protein 4 in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20231123-00117
- VernacularTitle:人附睾蛋白4在肺癌诊疗中的应用价值
- Author:
Yang YANG
1
;
Kairu NI
;
Chenhui GAO
;
Hong HUANG
;
Yizhen SHI
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院核医学科，苏州 215004
- Keywords:
Lung neoplasms;
Biomarkers, tumor;
Epididymal secretory proteins
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2024;44(10):597-602
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the advantages of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) compared with traditional tumor markers in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.Methods:From February 2021 to June 2022, 230 lung cancer patients (138 males, 92 females; age (61.1±12.3) years), 96 benign lung disease patients (62 males, 34 females; age (60.2±14.8) years; including 43 cases of lung benign placeholder and 53 cases of pulmonary infection), and 60 healthy volunteers (40 males, 20 females; age (62.8±11.4) years) from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were prospectively collected. Serum HE4, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)125 were detected by electrochemical analysis. The expression of HE4 in tumor tissues of 55 patients with lung cancer was detected by immunohistochemical method. χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Bonferroni correction method were used to analyze data. The diagnostic efficiencies of HE4 and other tumor markers were evaluated by ROC curve analysis and the difference of AUCs was analyzed by Delong test. Results:The positive expression rate of HE4 in adenocarcinoma tissue was significantly higher than that in non-adenocarcinoma tissue (93.1%(27/29) vs 23.1% (6/26); χ2=28.01, P<0.001). The level of serum HE4 in the lung cancer group (70.70(51.93, 109.05) pmol/L) was significantly higher than that in the pulmonary benign placeholder group (59.80(48.20, 73.50) pmol/L) and the healthy control group (55.25(44.60, 74.25) pmol/L), and that in the pulmonary infection group (97.90(76.62, 155.00) pmol/L) was higher than that in the lung cancer group ( H=46.19, all P<0.008 (Bonferroni correction method)). The levels of serum HE4 were significantly different in age, sex, smoking, disease stage and pathological types in early stage ( z values: from -5.07 to 9.83, all P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cut-off value of serum HE4 for diagnosing lung cancer was 79.22 pmol/L, with the sensitivity and specificity of 41.30%(95/230) and 83.33%(50/60). Compared with other traditional tumor markers, serum HE4 and CA125 showed the higher diagnostic value (AUC CA125 (0.695)>AUC HE4(0.656)>AUC CEA(0.614)>AUC CYFRA21-1(0.599)>AUC ProGRP (0.501)>AUC NSE (0.470)). The combination of HE4 with other traditional tumor markers significantly improved the diagnostic efficacy (AUC=0.750; z=2.75, P=0.006). Conclusions:HE4 is highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry. Serum HE4 exhibits a great application value in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, and plays an important role in assessment of patients′ conditions.
