Application value of intra-biliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing degree of biliary obstruction
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.03.014
- VernacularTitle:经胆管腔内超声造影在胆道梗阻程度评估中的应用价值
- Author:
Liping LUO
1
;
Yinglin LONG
;
Man ZHANG
;
Ge CHEN
;
Kai LI
;
Qingjin ZENG
;
Erjiao XU
;
Rongqin ZHENG
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第三医院超声科
- Keywords:
Endosonography;
Contrast media;
Cholangiography;
Cholestasis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery（Electronic Edition）
2018;7(3):226-230
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of intra-biliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IB-CEUS) in the evaluation of degree of biliary obstruction.Methods Clinical data of 105 patients with biliary obstructive disease who were diagnosed and treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. There were74 males and 31 females with the age ranging from 30 to 88 years old and the median age of 55 years old. Conventional ultrasound (CUS) and IB-CEUS were used to detect the biliary obstructive lesions in 105 patients. X-ray or CT cholangiography was used as the gold standard for diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of two methods was compared. The differences between these two methods and the gold standard in diagnosing the degree of biliary obstruction were evaluated by McNemar test. The consistency of the Results was assessed by Kappa consistency.Results The diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value of two methods were 100％ in diagnosing the complete obstruction of primary and second grade intrahepatic bile ducts. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of IB-CEUS in diagnosing the complete obstruction of primary grade intrahepatic bile ducts was respectively 95.8％, 91.9％ and 97.1％, higher than 57.7％, 53.1％ and 71.4％ of CUS. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of IB-CEUS in diagnosing the complete obstruction of second grade intrahepatic bile ducts was respectively 97.3％, 83.3％ and 97.6％, higher than 58.6％, 24.6％ and 63.5％ of CUS. Significant difference was observed in the diagnosis between CUS and gold standard (χ2=28.033, 46.000; P<0.05). CUS was fair or poor for the consistency of Results in diagnosing the complete biliary obstruction of primary and second grade intrahepatic bile ducts (k=0.470, 0.252), while no significant difference was observed between IB-CEUS and gold standard (P=0.250) and the consistency of Results was good (k=0.936, 0.896).Conclusions IB-CEUS can accurately evaluate the degree of intrahepatic biliary obstruction. The efficacy of IB-CEUS is better than that of CUS, and it has a good diagnostic consistency with the gold standard.
