Feasibility analysis of femoral anteversion angle measurement based on three-dimensional femoral model
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20240325-00169
- VernacularTitle:基于股骨三维模型测量股骨前倾角的可行性分析
- Author:
Jiahui CHEN
1
;
Xinlong MA
;
Jianxiong MA
;
Ying WANG
;
Haohao BAI
;
Bin LU
;
Shixiong ZHANG
Author Information
1. 天津市天津医院骨科研究所，天津 300021
- Keywords:
Femur;
Bone anteversion;
Imaging, three-dimensional
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2024;44(19):1288-1295
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To propose a method to measure the femoral anteversion angle based on the three-dimensional model of femur.Methods:From January 2019 to December 2023, a total of 50 patients (100 femurs) with patellar instability who underwent full-length CT examination of both lower limbs in Tianjin Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 16 males and 34 females, aged 28.5±11.9 years (range, 16-57 years). All patients underwent CT examination of both lower limbs, and the imaging data were imported into Mimics 21.0 software as DICOM format files. The femur was extracted by the threshold segmentation function, and the 3D model of the femur was reconstructed by appropriate trimming and smoothing. Three-dimensional models of the femur from 30 patients (60 femurs) were selected and imported into 3-matic 13.0 software for labeling of anatomical points and drawing of axes. The angle between the axis of the distal femur and the axis of the proximal femur was the femoral anteversion angle. Two observers positioned the spatial coordinates of the intercondylar fossa apex, the greater trochanter apex, the center of the femoral head, the femoral through-condylar axis and the posterior condylar tangent marker points on a 3D model of the femur to compare the differences between the groups. The femoral anteversion angles measured by different three-dimensional measurement methods were compared with the clinically reported femoral anteversion angles.Results:The difference between the femoral head center and intercondylar fossa apex coordinate data of 30 patients (60 femurs) measured by the two observers was not statistically significant ( P>0.05), whereas the data for the Y-axis coordinate of the greater trochanter apex were 25.77±23.21 and 22.08±25.73, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.906, P=0.017). The difference between the data of femoral through condylar and posterior condylar tangential coordinates of 30 patients (60 femurs) measured by the two observers was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Using the femoral mechanical axis as the projection direction, the angle between the transcondylar axis and the posterior condylar tangent line was 5.97°±2.02° (range, 1.48°-12.08°). The anterior tilt of the femur measured by the two observers in the femoral neck cylinder fitting method was 23.35°±7.45° and 24.94°±9.01°, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-2.147, P=0.040). The anterior inclination of the femur measured by the two observers in the femoral head ball enlargement method was 24.63°±7.66° and 25.12°±8.84°, the difference was not statistically significant ( t=-0.820, P=0.419). Using the femoral head ball expansion method to locate the proximal femoral axis, two observers measured the anterior tilt angle of the femur in 50 patients (100 femurs) according to the method described above, which was 23.30°±9.41° and 23.57°±9.97°, respectively, without a statistically significant difference ( t=-0.664, P=0.508), both smaller than the 29.56°±8.74° measured based on two-dimensional images in the imaging report, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The femoral anteversion angle measured by the angle between the axis of the femoral condyle and the axis of the femoral neck based on the three-dimensional model is accurate and effective, and the measured value is smaller than that based on the two-dimensional images in clinical practice.
