Comparison between olecranon osteotomy and bilateral triceps approach for the treatment of AO-C type distal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20231109-00298
- VernacularTitle:尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路与肱三头肌双侧入路治疗AO-C型肱骨远端骨折的meta分析
- Author:
Binzhi ZHAO
1
;
Yang LIU
;
Yanrui ZHAO
;
Lei SHAN
;
Junlin ZHOU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科，北京 100020
- Keywords:
Humeral fractures;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2024;44(17):1167-1175
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of internal fixation using the olecranon osteotomy approach versus the bilateral triceps approach for the treatment of AO type C distal humeral fractures.Methods:We conducted a systematic search of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, Chinese Medical Journal Full-Text Database, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for clinical studies comparing the olecranon osteotomy approach with the bilateral triceps approach for the treatment of AO type C distal humeral fractures. The search period was from January 2017 to March 2023. A meta-analysis was performed on the included studies. Random-effects models were used for analyses with high inter-group heterogeneity, while fixed-effects models were applied for those with low inter-group heterogeneity.Results:A total of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 480 cases treated via the olecranon osteotomy approach and 443 cases via the bilateral triceps approach. Meta-analysis results showed that the olecranon osteotomy approach was associated with longer operative time [ SMD=0.96, 95% CI(0.23, 1.70), P=0.010] and more intraoperative blood loss [ SMD=1.00, 95% CI(0.22, 1.78), P=0.012]compared to the bilateral triceps approach. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score [ SMD=0.55, 95% CI(-0.23, 1.32), P=0.167], excellent and good reduction rate [ OR=0.98, 95% CI(0.75, 1.27), P=0.856], postoperative complication rate [ OR=1.27, 95% CI(0.77, 2.09), P=0.344], healing time [ SMD= -0.13, 95% CI(-0.37, 0.11), P=0.280], and range of motion of the elbow joint [ SMD=-0.02, 95% CI(-0.29, 0.26), P=0.891]. Conclusion:The bilateral triceps approach for internal fixation of AO type C distal humeral fractures is associated with shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss compared to the olecranon osteotomy approach. The bilateral triceps approach for internal fixation of AO type C distal humeral fractures is associated with shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss compared to the olecranon osteotomy approach.
