Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20230626-00342
- VernacularTitle:机器人辅助与透视辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床疗效
- Author:
Chenyuan WANG
1
;
Jin FAN
;
Guoyong YIN
;
Yongxin REN
;
Qingqing LI
;
Lipeng YU
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院（江苏省人民医院）骨科，南京 210029
- Keywords:
Internal fixators;
Robotic surgical procedures;
Spinal fusion;
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2024;44(13):858-865
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods:A total of 27 patients with lumbar degenerative disease receiving robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (robot-assisted group) treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from May 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 9 males and 18 females, aged 61.00±9.11 years (range, 41-71 years). Twenty-seven patients who received fluoroscopic-assisted MIS-TLIF (fluoroscopic-assisted group) during the same period were selected as controls, including 16 males and 11 females, aged 56.70±11.97 years (range, 32-76 years). Operation time, intraoperative bleeding, radiation exposure time, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and postoperative complications were recorded. The learning curve of the robot-assisted group was drawn based on the amount of surgery and the operation time by fitting the logarithmic curve.Results:All patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 15.44±3.89 months (range, 12-24 months). The operation time, drainage volume, and hospitalization time in the robot-assisted group were 181.44±36.43 min, 43.70±22.04 ml, and 5.04±1.40 d, respectively, which were smaller than 223.22±59.40 min, 74.63±71.86 ml, 6.59±3.04 d in the fluoroscopy-assisted group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The radiation exposure time in robot-assisted group was 77.78±9.81 s, which was larger than fluoroscopy-assisted group (63.78±17.70 s). There were statistically significant differences in lumbar VAS scores between the two groups before and after surgery ( P<0.05), 3 days after operation and the last follow-up was smaller than those before operation. The VAS score on postoperative day 3 in the robot-assisted group was 2.52±0.98, which was less than 3.07±0.87 in the fluoroscopically-assisted group ( t=0.294, P=0.032). In both groups, 108 pedicle screws were placed, and the accuracy of nail placement in the robot-assisted group was 93.5% (101/108), which was greater than that in the fluoroscopically-assisted group 77.8% (84/108), and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=11.821, P=0.008). By fitting a logarithmic curve to describe the relationship between the number of operations and the operation time of the robotic-assisted group of operators, the results showed that the operation time decreased with the increase of the number of operations, and the operation time fluctuated greatly in the first 10 cases, and then gradually shortened and stabilized after 10 operations. Conclusion:Robot-assisted MIS-TLIF can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, improve the early postoperative pain and shorten the learning curve.
