Posterior apical total intervertebral release combined with posterior column osteotomy for the treatment of rigid scoliosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20231203-00354
- VernacularTitle:后路顶椎区全椎间隙松解联合后柱截骨术治疗僵硬性脊柱侧凸
- Author:
Fengzhao ZHU
1
;
Yaqing ZHANG
;
Chencheng FENG
;
Tongwei CHU
;
Changqing LI
;
Yue ZHOU
;
Bo HUANG
Author Information
1. 陆军军医大学第二附属医院（重庆新桥医院）骨科，重庆 400037
- Keywords:
Thoracic vertebrae;
Lumbar vertebrae;
Scoliosis;
Diskectomy;
Osteotomy;
Intervertebral release
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2024;44(8):561-568
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of posterior apical total intervertebral release (IVR) combined with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) in the treatment of rigid scoliosis.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic data of 27 patients with rigid scoliosis who underwent posterior total IVR combined with PCO in the apical region from July 2017 to September 2023. There were 10 males and 17 females with an age of 19.3±8.8 years (range 11-48 years). Among them, there were 16 cases of idiopathic scoliosis, 7 cases of neuromuscular scoliosis, 1 case of congenital scoliosis, 1 case of Marfan syndrome with scoliosis, 1 case of neurofibromatosis with scoliosis, and 1 case of osteogenesis imperfecta with scoliosis. The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 75.4°±13.7° (range 58.7°-110.2°) preoperatively. The mean flexibility of the main curvature is 15.7%±4.7% (range 2.5%-24.3%). Preoperative computer tomography showed that the area of the IVR channel in the convex and concave side of the apical region was 128.1±23.3 mm 2 and 89.5±18.6 mm 2, respectively. The area of the convex IVR was significantly higher than that of the concave IVR. Results:All 27 patients underwent surgery successfully. Total IVR was performed at an average of 3.4±0.7 levels in the apical region. SPO and Ponte osteotomy were performed at 2.7±0.7 and 4.9±1.1 levels, respectively. The mean fusion segment is 11.2±2.0. The operation time, estimated blood loss, and follow-up time were 7.5±0.9 hours (range 6.0-9.8 hours), 1 103.7±845.1 ml (range 300-4 500 ml), and 20.0±14.2 months (range 5-56 months), respectively. The preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up's mean coronal Cobb angles of the main curve were 75.4°±13.7°, 18.2°±6.5° and 18.6°±6.5°, respectively. The mean correction rate was 75.7%±5.3%. In cases of thoracolumbar kyphosis, the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up mean sagittal Cobb angles were 47.2°±4.7°, 22.8°±9.1° and 23.8°±8.9°, respectively. The mean correction rate was 49.5%±18.9%. The mean axial vertebral rotation (AVR) in the IVR region was 24.6°±7.6° preoperatively and was corrected to 11.6°±5.6° postoperatively. The mean correction rate for AVR was 54.0%±11.3%. The coronal, sagittal Cobb angles and AVR postoperatively were significantly lower than those preoperatively ( P<0.001). This case series reported 4 cases of postoperative pleural effusion and 1 case of pulmonary infection, and all of them were cured through conservative treatment. One patient developed incision infection 2 months postoperatively and recovered through debridement surgery. Two patients had proximal junctional kyphosis, one of them underwent revision surgery, and another case was treated with braces. Conclusion:Posterior multi-segment total IVR combined with PCO is a safe and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of rigid scoliosis. The procedure of total IVR was recommended as a supplement for better release of the rigid spine when traditional release methods are not effective.
