Analysis of the application of novel sinus tract irrigation with negative pressure drainage in the treatment of abdominal infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20240512-00138
- VernacularTitle:新型窦道冲洗负压引流在胰十二指肠切除术后腹腔感染治疗中的应用分析
- Author:
Jiejie DONG
1
;
Tong ZHANG
;
Peng YAO
;
Xiaozheng LI
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学附属运城市中心医院肝胆外科，运城 044000
- Keywords:
Pancreaticoduodenectomy;
Postoperative pancreatic fistula;
Abdominal infection;
Abdominal drainage tube sinus tract;
Negative pressure drainage
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2024;30(9):678-683
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate an effective manner to replace the drainage tube due to drainage complications during the irrigation treatment of abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Methods:Clinical data of 39 patients with abdominal infection after PD due to drainage complications who were successfully treated by replacement of the drainage tubes with continued flushing in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yuncheng Central Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University from August 2020 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 23 males and 16 females, aged (54.8±9.6) years. According to the fashion of tube replacement, patients were divided into the observation group ( n=21), in which a flushing tube was placed through the original abdominal drainage tube sinus tract combined with external negative pressure suction; and the control group ( n=18), in which two parallel drainage tubes were placed through the original abdominal drainage tube sinus tract for flushing and drainage. The two groups were compared in terms of indicators before tube replacement, including the primary tumor classification, incidence of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula after PD, complications of abdominal drainage, time from the surgery to tube replacement; and indicators after tube replacement, including total hospital stay, hospitalization cost, continuous abdominal lavage time, fever and elevated white blood cell count, number of dressing changes, etc. Results:There were no significant difference in the primary tumor classification, incidence of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula after PD, complications of abdominal drainage, and time from PD to tube replacement between the two groups before tube replacement (all P>0.05). After tube replacement, the total hospitalization time(32.7±1.9 vs 44.7±14.5, d), hospitalization cost (67 604±16 052 vs 91 845±19 826, yuan), continuous abdominal lavage time [4.0 (3.0, 5.0) vs 9.0 (8.0, 10.8), d], fever [23.8% (5/21) vs 55.6% (10/18)] and leukocytosis rate [28.6% (6/21) vs 66.7% (12/18)], and times of dressing change times [10.0 (7.0, 13.0) vs 22.0 (18.2, 27.0)] of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Inserting a flushing tube through the sinus tract of original abdominal drainage tube combined with external negative pressure drainage is an effective way to manage the abdominal infection after PD surgery due to drainage complications, featuring good irrigation and drainage, short irrigation time, and early control of the abdominal infection.
