The prognosis of ⅢCr stage cervical cancer patients with different T and N status after radical radiotherapy
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20230821-00059
- VernacularTitle:不同T和N分期的ⅢCr期宫颈癌患者根治性放疗后疗效分析
- Author:
Yingchang WANG
1
;
Tao FENG
;
Qing XU
;
Chufan WU
;
Hanmei LOU
;
Xiaojuan LYU
Author Information
1. 浙江省肿瘤医院妇瘤放疗科，杭州 310022
- Keywords:
Uterine cervical neoplasms;
Radiotherapy, radical;
Prognosis;
FIGO staging;
Neoplasm staging
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2024;33(8):726-732
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the difference of prognosis in ⅢCr stage cervical cancer patients with different T stage and lymph node status who received radical radiotherapy.Methods:Clinical data of 279 patients with ⅢCr stage cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from September 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the latest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage, all patients were divided into T 2a, T 2b, T 3a and T 3b stage groups, and N 1 and N 2 stage groups based on lymph node status. They were also divided into <1.85 cm and ≥1.85 cm groups according to the maximum short diameter of lymph node. In addition, they were assigned into ≤3 and>3 groups according to the number of lymph node metastasis. The differences of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with different T stage and lymph node status were compared by Kaplan-Meier test and log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox regression analysis. Results:Among 279 patients with ⅢCr stage cervical cancer receiving radical radiotherapy, 6 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with stage T 2a stage, 109 (39.1%) patients with T 2b stage, 13 (4.7%) patients with T 3a stage, and 151 (54.1%) patients with T 3b stage. And 246 (88.2%) patients were diagnosed with N 1 stage and 33 (11.8%) patients with N 2 stage. According to the maximum short diameter of lymph nodes, there were 229 (82.1%) patients in the<1.85 cm group and 50 (17.9%) in the ≥1.85 cm group. According to the number of lymph node metastasis, there were 269 (96.4%) patients in the ≤3 group and 10 (3.6%) in the>3 group. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS ( P=0.136) and OS rates ( P=0.050) among patients with different T stages, and patients with T 3a stage had the worst prognosis (5-year OS rate was 38.5%). The 5-year PFS (48.0% vs. 64.2%, P=0.016) and OS rates (52.0% vs. 73.8%, P=0.001) in the ≥1.85 cm group were significantly lower than those in the<1.85 cm group. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (61.0% vs. 63.6%, P=0.796) and OS rates (67.5% vs. 69.7%, P=0.770) between patients with N 1 and N 2 stages. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (61.0% vs. 70.0%, P=0.653) and OS rates (67.3% vs. 80.0%, P=0.447) between patients in the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 and>3 groups. The prognosis of patients with T 2b stage and the maximum short diameter ≥1.85 cm was the worst (5-year OS rate was 31.3%), while patients with T 2b stage and the maximum short diameter <1.85 cm obtained the best prognosis (5-year OS rate was 76.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that the maximum short diameter and radiation dose of lymph nodes were the independent relevant factors for the OS of ⅢCr stage cervical cancer patients (both P<0.05). Conclusions:Among ⅢCr stage cervical cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy, clinical efficacy and prognosis significantly differ according to different T stage and lymph node status. Current staging system should be optimized to provide effective diagnostic and therapeutic regimens.
