Positivity of antinuclear antibody and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody in three ethnic groups in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
10.3760/cma.j.cn141217-20240202-00055
- VernacularTitle:新疆地区三个民族抗核抗体和抗双链DNA抗体阳性情况分析
- Author:
Jiaqi WANG
1
;
Xue WU
;
Xinyan MENG
;
Xiaomei CHEN
;
Cainan LUO
;
Zhengfang LI
;
Lijun WU
Author Information
1. 新疆大学生命科学与技术学院，乌鲁木齐 830017
- Keywords:
Antinuclear antibody;
Anti-double-stranded DNA antibody;
Karyotype
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
2024;28(8):571-574
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the positivity rate and high titer of antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibody in healthy Tajik, Kirgiz, and Han Chinese populations in Xinjiang.Methods:A total of 3 687 cases of Tajik residents, 2 140 cases of Kyrgyz residents, and 2 034 cases of Han residents were selected as the study subjects, and ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected and comparatively analyzed. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software with χ2 test. Results:The positive rate of ANA in Tajik group was 15.1% [(555/3 687), 10.2%(147/1 445) male, 18.2%(408/2 242) female], of which high titers accounted for 25.8%(143/555). It was 16.7%(357/2 140) in the Kyrgyz group [10.3% male(101/980), 19.4%(256/1 160) female], with high titers accounting for 14.8%; and in the Han group, the positivity rate was 16.6% [9.8%(70/720) male, 19.1%(267/1 314) female], with high titers accounting for 18.4%(62/1 337). There was no significant difference in ANA positivity rate among the three ethnic groups( χ2=3.64, P=0.162), but there were differences in the percentage of high titer of ANA in Tajik ethnic group compared with Han and Kyrgyz ethnic groups(25.8% vs. 18.4%, χ2=6.02, P=0.014; 25.8% vs.14.8%, χ2=14.71, P=0.001), which accounted for a high percentage. The highest number of ANA high titers in all three groups was in the age group of 51~60 years. The ANA karyotype with the highest percentage of high titers in the Tajik and Kyrgyz populations was granular, while it was homogeneous and in the Han it was homogeneous.The positive rate of anti-dsDNA antibody in the Tajik group was 0.71%(26/3 687), of which high titer accounted for 23.1%(6/126); in the Kyrgyz group, it was 0.75%(16/2 034), and high titer accounted for 31.3%(4/14); and in the Han group, the positive rate was 0.69%(14/2 034), of which high titer accounted for 28.6%(4/64), and there was no statistical significance of in the difference in the positive rate of anti-dsDNA antibody and the proportion of high titer among the three groups( χ2=0.06, P=0.972; χ2=0.37, P=0.832). Conclusion:The percentage of ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies and high titers varied vary among the three ethnic groups in this study, and long-term follow-up is needed to monitor keep an eye on the incidence of autoimmune diseases in people with high autoantibody titers.
