Value of evaluating segmental myocardial work heterogeneity in the prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy response
10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20240113-00036
- VernacularTitle:节段心肌做功的异质性评估预测心脏再同步化治疗效果的价值
- Author:
Mengruo ZHU
1
;
Yanan WANG
;
Yufei CHENG
;
Haiyan CHEN
;
Xianhong SHU
Author Information
1. 复旦大学附属中山医院心脏超声诊断科 上海市心血管病研究所 上海市影像医学研究所，上海 200032
- Keywords:
Echocardiography;
Cardiac resynchronization therapy;
Myocardial work;
Pressure-strain loop;
Non-invasive;
Segmental heterogeneity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2024;33(6):468-474
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the value of myocardial work difference between left ventricular lateral wall and septum at baseline in the prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and compare their predictive performance with conventional echocardiographic parameters.Methods:One hundred and six heart failure patients who were retrospectively recruited from January 2021 to January 2023, underwent speckle tracking echocardiography before CRT and at 6-month follow-up.Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), global work efficiency (GWE), as well as segmental myocardial work index (MWI), constructive work (CW), wasted work (WW) and myocardial work efficiency (MWE), were acquired from non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain loops before CRT. The differences of all myocardial work indices between left ventricular lateral wall and septum (L-S) at the mid-ventricular level, namely, L-S MWI, L-S CW, L-S WW and L-S MWE were calculated. Response to CRT was defined as left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction ≥15% at 6-month follow-up.Results:CRT response was present in seventy-eight (74%, 78/105) patients. ①At baseline, responders exhibited significantly higher GWI and GCW than non-responders (both P<0.05). ②Besides, L-S MWI, L-S CW, L-S WW and L-S MWE were significant higher in CRT responders than in non-responders at baseline (all P<0.01). ③In multivariate regression analysis, baseline LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) ( OR=0.993, 95% CI=0.987-0.999, P=0.020), interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) ( OR=1.025, 95% CI=1.001-1.050, P=0.040) and L-S MWI ( OR=1.002, 95% CI=1.001-1.003, P=0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response. ④ROC analysis demonstrated that L-S MWI (AUC=0.830, P<0.001) was the most powerful predictor of CRT response and was superior to LVEDV (AUC=0.718, P<0.01) and IVMD (AUC=0.704, P=0.001). ⑤L-S MWI >884 mmHg% was recommended to predict CRT response with the optimal sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 86%. Conclusions:The noninvasive evaluation of myocardial work heterogeneity between left ventricular lateral wall and septum is more valuable than conventional parameters in predicting CRT response and guiding patient selection before CRT, which helps to further improve CRT response rate.
