Comparison of hamstring tendon graft, ligament advanced reinforcement system, and mixed ligament in reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20231029-00174
- VernacularTitle:关节镜下三种移植物重建后交叉韧带的疗效比较
- Author:
Lingxiao WU
1
;
Zhi QIAO
;
Yang YU
;
Jun TAN
;
Jianzhong XU
Author Information
1. 郑州大学第一附属医院骨科，郑州 450052
- Keywords:
Posterior cruciate ligament;
Wounds and injuries;
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;
Hamstring tendon autograft;
LARS artificial ligament;
Mixed l
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2024;26(6):512-518
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare hamstring tendon graft (HTG), ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS), and mixed HTG & LARS ligament in reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 59 patients with PCL rupture who had been admitted to Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University for arthroscopic PCL reconstruction between January 2018 and August 2021. The patients were divided into 3 groups: in the HTG group of 21 cases [14 males and 7 females aged (37.8±12.6) years], PCL was reconstructed by HTG; in the LARS group of 20 cases [12 males and 8 females aged (34.3±9.1) years], PCL was reconstructed by LARS; in the mixed group of 18 cases [13 males and 5 females aged (33.2±8.3) years], PCL was reconstructed by the mixed HTG & LARS ligament. The 3 groups were compared in terms of Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and laxity disparity between bilateral knees at 1 and 2 years after surgery.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative general data between the 3 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). One year after surgery, the mixed group had a significantly higher IKDC score [(90.0±6.5) points] than the HTG group [(78.1±5.7) points] and the LARS group [(84.1±7.3) points], and a significantly higher Lysholm score [(88.9±5.5) points] and a significantly smaller laxity disparity between bilateral knees [(2.8±1.7) mm] than the HTG group [(81.8±4.6) points, (4.7±2.4) mm] ( P<0.05). Two years after surgery, the mixed group had a Lysholm score of (93.0±4.5) points, a IKDC score of (92.5±5.7) points, and a laxity disparity between bilateral knees of (2.3±1.8) mm, all significantly better than those in the HTG group [(88.5±5.5) points, (82.7±5.7) points, and (4.2±2.5) mm] and in the LARS group [(89.0±5.2) points, (86.5±7.3) points, and (3.8±2.2) mm] ( P<0.05). In all the 3 groups, the knee function scores and laxity disparities between bilateral knees at 1 and 2 years after surgery were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Satisfactory clinical outcomes can be obtained after arthroscopic PCL reconstruction using HTG, LARS or the mixed HTG & LARS ligament. However, the mixed ligament as a graft can achieve better clinical efficacy than the other two grafts.
