A comparative study on the bite force after modified Widman's flap.
10.5051/jkape.2005.35.2.371
- Author:
Sang Jin PAEK
1
;
Sung Bin LIM
;
Chin Hyung CHUNG
;
Ki Seok HONG
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University, Korea. periodk@dan- kook.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Bite force;
modified Widman's flap;
mobility
- MeSH:
Bicuspid;
Bite Force*;
Chronic Periodontitis;
Humans;
Molar;
Prognosis;
Prosthodontics;
Tooth
- From:The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology
2005;35(2):371-381
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The masticatory function of tooth is maintained by the periodontal health, and periodontal health is also maintained by the masticatory function. Bite forces are withstanded by the PDL, and this thought to be through the viscoelastic theory. Mobility test and Bite force test are used to evaluate the viscoelastic theory of the PDL. In this study, the bite force test was used. In the same conditions of quantity of the supporting tissue, the maximum bite force according to the quality of the supporting tissue was evaluated. The study was conducted on 40 patients with moderate adult periodontitis, who were indications to the modified widman flap treatment. The maximum bite force in the premolar and molar regions were tested before treatment, 3weeks and 4 weeks after treatment. and the results were as follows. 1. In the premolar region, 3 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment showed higher maximum bite force than before treatment. And in the molar region the maximum bite force decreased 3 weeks after treatment, but increased after 4 weeks, compared to before treatment. 2. In the 1st premolar, there were only significant difference between before and 3 weeks after treatment, and between and 4 weeks after treatment. 3. In the 2nd premolar, there were only significant difference between before and 3 weeks after treatment, and between and 4 weeks after treatment. 4. In the 1st molar, there were no significant difference between before, 3 weeks after treatment, 4 weeks after treatment. 5. In the 2nd molar, there were no significant difference between before, 3 weeks after treatment, 4 weeks after treatment. From the results above, it shows that there were improvements in the maximum bite force through specific periodontal treatments, and thus it can be considered in clinical situations, that selection of the prosthodontic material, decisions of extraction, evaluation of the prognosis after periodontal treatment is a helpful method.
