The Effects of various Regeneration techniques on Bone Regeneration around Dental Implant.
10.5051/jkape.2005.35.2.383
- Author:
Myung Ja LEE
1
;
Sung Bin LIM
;
Chin Hyung CHUNG
;
Ki Seok HONG
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University, Korea. boneperi@dankook .ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Regeneration;
implant;
platelet-rich plasma
- MeSH:
Bone Regeneration*;
Bone Remodeling;
Dental Implants*;
Femur;
Heterografts;
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins;
Membranes;
Osteogenesis;
Platelet-Rich Plasma;
Regeneration*;
Transplants
- From:The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology
2005;35(2):383-399
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The successful implantation necessitate tissue regeneration in site of future implant placement, there being severe bone defect. Therapeutic approaches to tissue regeneration in the site have used bone grafts, root surface treatments, barrier membranes, and growth factors, the same way being applied to periodontal tissue regeneration. Great interest in periodontal tissue regeneration has lead to research in bone graft, guided-tissue regeneration, and the administration of growth factors as possible means of regenerating lost periodontal tissue. The blood component separated by centrifuging the blood is the platelet-rich plasma. There are growth factors, PDGF, TGFbeta1, TGFbeta2 and IGF in the platelet-rich plasma. The purpose of this study was to study the histopathological correlation between the use of platelet-rich plasma and the healing of bone defect around implant fixture site. Implant fixtures were inserted and graft materials were placed into the left femur of in the experimental group, while the control group received only implant fixtures. In the first experimental group, platelet-rich plasma and BBP xenograft were placed at the implant fixture site, and the second experimental group had platelet-rich plasma, BBP xenograft, and the e-PTFE membrane placed at the fixture site. The degree of bone regeneration adjacent to the implant fixture was observed and compared histopathologically at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant fixture insertion. The results of the experiment were as follows: 1. Bone remodeling in acid etched surface near the implant fixture of all experimental groups was found to be greater than new bone formation. 2. Bone remodeling in acid etched surface distant to the implant fixture of all experimental groups was decreased and new bone formation was not changed. 3. Significant new bone formation in machined surface near the implant fixture of bothl experimental groups was observed in 2 weeks. 4. New bone formation in machined surface distant to the implant fixture of both experimental groups was observed. Bone remodeling was significant in near the implant fixture and not in distant to the implant fixture. The results of the experiment suggested that the change of bone formation around implant. Remodeling in machined surface distant to the implant fixture of both experimental groups, and new bone formation and remodeling near the implant fixture were significant.
