Value of Second Pass in Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure.
10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.110
- Author:
Kidong KIM
1
;
Soon Beom KANG
;
Hyun Hoon CHUNG
;
Tack Sang LEE
;
Jae Weon KIM
;
Noh Hyun PARK
;
Yong Sang SONG
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ksboo308@plaza.snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Second-Pass Technique;
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia;
Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure;
Endocervical Margin Involvement;
Conization
- MeSH:
Adult;
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/pathology/*surgery;
Electrosurgery/*methods;
Female;
Humans;
Hysterectomy;
Medical Records;
Middle Aged;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis/epidemiology;
Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis/epidemiology;
Odds Ratio;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors;
Severity of Illness Index;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2009;24(1):110-113
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the rate of incomplete resection and treatment outcome of the second-pass technique with those of single-pass technique in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP). From 1997 to 2002, 683 women were diagnosed as squamous dysplasia via LEEP in our institution. Age, parity, LEEP technique, grade of lesion, glandular extension, margin status, residual tumor and recurrence were obtained by reviewing medical records. Positive margin was defined as mild dysplasia or higher grade lesions at resection margin of the LEEP specimen. In women who underwent hysterectomy, residual tumor was defined as mild dysplasia or higher grade lesions in hysterectomy specimen. In women who did not underwent hysterectomy, Pap smear more than atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or biopsy result more than mild dysplasia within two years after LEEP were regarded as cytologic or histologic recurrences, respectively. Treatment failure of LEEP was defined as residual tumor or histologic recurrence. The second-pass technique significantly reduced the endocervical margin positivity (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.63). However, the second-pass technique did not reduce the treatment failure (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.29-1.32). In conclusion, the second-pass technique markedly reduced the endocervical margin positivity, but did not reduce the treatment failure rate of LEEP.
