The application of ultrasound evaluation of atelectasis in general anesthesia
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20230216-00169
- VernacularTitle:超声评估肺不张在全麻中的应用
- Author:
Liming DAI
1
;
Xiangwei LING
;
Wei LI
;
Ji ZHU
;
Bei PAN
;
Fumei TIAN
Author Information
1. 皖南医学院第二附属医院麻醉科，芜湖 241000
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Anesthesia, general;
Pulmonary atelectasis
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2024;26(4):564-567
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application effect of ultrasound evaluation of atelectasis in general anesthesia.Methods:Eighty patients who underwent general anesthesia surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the study subjects. The gold standard was chest CT diagnosis of perioperative atelectasis, and they were divided into atelectasis group (39 cases) and control group (41 cases). Twelve regional images, including left upper anterior chest, left lower anterior chest, right upper anterior chest, right lower anterior chest, left upper chest, left lower chest, right upper chest, right upper chest, right lower chest, right upper chest, right lower chest, right upper chest, right lower chest, right lower chest, right lower chest, left upper chest, right lower chest, left upper chest, right lower chest, left upper posterior region, left lower chest, left lower posterior region, left lower posterior region, right upper posterior region, and right lower posterior region, were collected by pulmonary ultrasound (LUS) at time points T 1 after entering the room, 30 minutes after tracheal intubation (T 2), 30 minutes after extubation (T 3), 24 hours after surgery (T 4), and 48 hours after surgery (T 5), And an improved semi quantitative scoring method for evaluating lung ventilation was used to compare the LUS scores of the two groups at 5 time points. Results:There was no statistically significant difference in LUS scores between the two groups of patients in different lung zones at T 1 (all P>0.05); There are varying degrees of differences in LUS scores for the same lung partition at different times (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in LUS scores between T 2 and T 5 for left upper anterior chest, left lower anterior chest, right upper anterior chest, left upper chest, right upper chest, left upper posterior region, and right upper posterior region (all P>0.05); The LUS scores of the T 2-T 5 atelectasis group in the lower left chest, lower right chest, lower left posterior area, and lower right posterior area were higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusions:LUS can be used to evaluate atelectasis during general anesthesia and has broad clinical application and promotion value.
