Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units Scale
10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2024.08.008
- VernacularTitle:ICU医护人员感知压力源量表中文版的效度和信度检验
- Author:
Aiping HU
1
,
2
;
Jia WANG
;
Qimin ZHOU
;
Yuanqiu HUANG
;
Shuang YANG
;
Yuqi SHEN
;
Mingfang XIANG
Author Information
1. 四川大学华西第二医院妇产科特需病区,成都 610041
2. 出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041
- Keywords:
intensive care unit;
healthcare professionals;
stressor;
validity;
reliability
- From:
Chinese Mental Health Journal
2024;38(8):686-692
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate the perceived stressors in intensive care units Scale into Chinese version,and to validate its validity and reliability and in intensive healthcare professionals.Methods:The Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units Scale was translated according to the Brislin translation model.After cultural adjustment,495 ICU healthcare professionals were selected to evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale,and univariate analysis was conducted on the scores of the Scale with different characteristics.Results:The Chinese version of the scale re-tained 40 items,and 6 common factors were extracted after exploratory factor analysis.The cumulative variance contribution rate reached 58.21％.Confirmatory factor analysis showed a basic fit of the model(x2/df=2.85,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.09).The total Cronbach coefficient of the scale was 0.940 and the split-half relia-bility was 0.87.The retest reliability after 2 weeks was 0.92.The item-level content validity index of the Chinese version of The Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units Scale was 0.83～1.00,the scale-level content validity index was 0.93,and the average content validity was 0.98.Comparison of the total scores of scale among ICU healthcare professionals with different occupations,professional titles,marital status and working years showed sta-tistically significant differences(P＜0.05).Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units Scale is proved to be a good instrument with acceptable validity and reliability.
