Analysis of a questionnaire survey on several issues related to the Chinese expert consensus on cerebrovascular ultrasound detection
10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2024.11.005
- VernacularTitle:基于制定脑血管超声检测若干问题中国专家共识的调查分析
- Author:
Jingxin ZHONG
1
;
Aihua OU
;
Yang HUA
Author Information
1. 510120 广州,广东省中医院脑病功能科
- Keywords:
Surveys and questionnaires;
Ultrasonography,Doppler,transcranial;
Cerebrovascular;
Expert consensus
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2024;21(11):752-758
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the current status,diagnostic difficulties,and the necessity of formulating a consensus on several issues of cerebrovascular ultrasound examination in China.Methods A network questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate several problems of cerebrovascular ultrasound and the needs of expert consensus among practitioners of transcranial Doppler(TCD)ultrasound and transcranial color coded Doppler(TCCD)ultrasound in medical institutions.The questionnaire covered the basic information of the respondent group,including the region where the medical institution was located(Q1),the level of the medical institution(Q2),the scope of practice of TCD or TCCD practitioners(Q3),title(Q4);the assessment mode of cerebrovascular and cervical vascular(Q5);the general demand for expert consensus(Q6)and TCD diagnosis-related issues(Q7-Q17).There were three dimensions of TCD diagnosis-related issues(diagnostic criteria,multi-dimensional comprehensive assessment,and dynamic monitoring during the perioperative period of angioplasty),with a total of 11 items(Q7-Q17:intracranial artery stenosis or occlusion,vascular development anomalies,side branch circulation judgment,ultrasound dynamic monitoring after angioplasty,cerebral vasospasm,contrast-enhanced TCD examination,etc.).At the same time,open-ended questions were also set up:the most important content to be improved in cerebrovascular ultrasound(Q18).The reliability analysis of the questionnaire was used to assess the reliability,with Cronbach's α coefficient ≥0.7 considered as good reliability.The validity evaluation was conducted by factor analysis.The comparison of the demand for each item under different conditions was conducted by x2 test,and the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare ranked data among different groups.Results A total of 1 395 complete and valid questionnaires were collected,involving TCD or TCCD practitioners from 31 provinces,autonomous regions,and municipalities(there was no response from the Xizang Autonomous Region),which had a certain representativeness.Survey reliability evaluation:Cronbach's α coefficient=0.917(F=132.702,P＜0.01).Factor analysis,KOM=0.930(x2=8 478.844,P＜0.01),the cumulative contribution rate was 70.600％when taking into account three factors.Among the respondents,the proportion of those from tertiary-level grade A hospitals was the highest(64.2％[896/1 395]);the distribution of titles was dominated by those of attending physicians(48.5％[676/1 395]),followed by senior titles(37.2％[519/1 395]);among the respondents,66.6％(929/1 395)said they urgently needed expert consensus,while 32.7％(456/1 395)said they needed to improve existing standards.There were significant differences in the needs for expert consensus and each item across different regions,professional titles and evaluation models(all P＜0.05).Conclusions The questionnaire have high reliability and validity.There is an urgent need for expert consensus on several issues related to cerebrovascular ultrasound among the respondents.The establishment of expert consensus would contribute to standardized and precise evaluation system,thereby promoting quality control management and standardization of cerebrovascular ultrasound practices.
