Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on speech function in patients with conductive aphasia after stroke
10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2024.10.005
- VernacularTitle:经颅直流电刺激对卒中后传导性失语症患者语言功能的治疗效果研究
- Author:
Dahua ZHANG
1
;
Weiqun SONG
;
Tiantian ZHANG
;
Yinan CHENG
;
Jie WANG
;
Yuting ZHAO
Author Information
1. 100053 北京,首都医科大学宣武医院康复医学科
- Keywords:
Anomia;
Aphasia,conduction;
Transcranial direct current stimulation;
Repetition;
Picture-naming
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2024;21(10):678-683
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)in the left posterior sylvia temporal-parietal association area on language function in patients with post-stroke conductive aphasia.Methods The post-stroke aphasia patients admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University were prospectively included from June 2021 to April 2024.A self-cross randomized controlled trial was performed in this study.The patients enrolled were assessed as conductive aphasia by Western aphasia test kit diagnostic criteria.Twelve patients with post-stroke conductive aphasia were completely randomly divided into group A(treatment sequence:stage A—washout period—stage B)and group B(treatment sequence:stage B—washout period—stage A),with 6 cases in each group.Stage A performed true tDCS therapy combined with speech and language training,and stage B performed sham tDCS therapy combined with speech and language training.During washout period,only speech and language training was performed,and each stage was trained for 5 days.The tDCS anode is the stimulation electrode and is placed at the stimulation target.The cathode is the reference electrode and is placed on the right shoulder.The intensity of tDCS was 1.4 mA,the true stimulation was 20 min/time,and the sham stimulation stopped automatically after only 30 s/time,both twice/d,and a total of 10 times treatment were performed.Speech and language training was performed 30 min/time,2 times/d,a total of 10 times treatment.The function of rehearsal and picture naming(training item and non-training item)were examined before and after treatment of stage A and B immediately,and the difference of function scores of rehearsal and picture naming(training item and non-training item)before and after treatment of stage A and B were compared.Results(1)There were no significant differences in gender,age,course of disease and educational level between group A and group B(all P＞0.05).(2)Before and after washout period,there were no statistical significance in functional scores of rehearsal and picture naming(training items and non-training items)in both group A and group B(all P＞0.05).(3)There were no significant differences in functional scores of rehearsal and picture naming(training items and non-training items)between group A and group B before and after washout treatment(all P＞0.05).(4)Compared with the difference before and after treatment of stage B,the function scores difference before and after treatment of stage A in rehearsal function,picture naming(training item)and picture naming(non-training item)were higher([6.9±1.4]scores vs.[2.2±1.0]scores,t=9.604;[6.2±1.2]scores vs.[1.8±1.1]scores,t=9.277;[6.5±1.0]scores vs.[1.5±1.0]scores,t=12.247;all P＜0.01).Conclusions Preliminary analysis suggested that tDCS intervention in the brain tissue of the temporoparietal association area of the left posterior lateral cleft may help improve the rehearsal and picture naming(training and non-training items)ability in conductive aphasia patients after stroke.The sample size of this study is small,and the results need to be further explored.
