Efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban infusion used in stent-assisted coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms
10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2024.09.002
- VernacularTitle:低剂量替罗非班用于急性颅内破裂动脉瘤支架置入结合弹簧圈栓塞治疗的有效性和安全性分析
- Author:
Yi MO
1
;
Jie CAO
;
Xucheng ZHU
;
Ronghua CHEN
;
Huaming SHAO
;
Jinggang XUAN
;
Ya PENG
Author Information
1. 213000 江苏省常州市第一人民医院神经外科
- Keywords:
Ruptured intracranial aneurysm;
Subarachnoid hemorrhage;
Tirofiban;
Low-dose;
Stent-assisted coil embolization
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2024;21(9):587-594
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban in stent-assisted coil embolization(SAC)for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Methods From April 2011 to September 2020,335 patients of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH)admitted in the First People's Hospital of Changzhou were retrospectively analyzed.All cases underwent stent-assisted coil embolization within 24-48 h and antiplatelet medications.The patients were divided into dual antibody group(89 cases)and tirofiban group(246 cases).Baseline and clinical data of all patients were collected for comparison between groups,including age,sex,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,Hunt-Hess grade at admission,modified Fisher scale score at admission,aneurysm diameter(＞5 mm,≤5 mm),aneurysm location(anterior circulation,posterior circulation),postoperative acute hydrocephalus or intraventricular hemorrhage,postoperative complete embolization rate of ruptured aneurysm.All patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm with SAH were confirmed by emergency cerebral CT scan after admission.The Raymond grading criteria were used to evaluate the embolization effect after operation:grade Ⅰ refers to no development(complete embolization),grade Ⅱ refers to only aneurysm neck development(incomplete embolization),and grade Ⅲ refers to aneurysm body development,in which Raymond grading Ⅰ orⅡ indicates effective embolization.Tirofiban group:4.2 μg/kg tirofiban was intravenously injected after the coil was placed in the aneurysm lumen and the stent was released,followed by maintenance dose 0.07 μg/(kg·min)for 6-8 h,and aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg were given as sequential dual antiplatelet therapy 2 hours before the tirofiban infusion was stopped.Dual antiplatelet group:a loading dose of aspirin 300 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg was given at least 2 hours before stent implantation,and then transferred to aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg given on the second day after operation.All patients received aspirin(100mg/d)for 6 months and clopidogrel(75 mg/d)for 3 months after operation.The efficacy indicators,safety indicators,adverse events and other complications of the two groups were collected and compared.The efficacy indicators were the incidence of thrombotic events during operation and within 72 hours after operation.The safety indicators were the incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative intracranial hemorrhage(within 48 hours after operation),the incidence of late postoperative intracranial hemorrhage(over 48 hours after operation),and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage related to external ventricular drainage(symptomatic and asymptomatic).The adverse event was the occurrence of drug-related thrombocytopenia.Other complications were delayed ischemic events.The modified Rankin scale(mRS)score was used to evaluate the clinical prognosis of patients at 180 days after operation.mRS score ≤2 was defined as good prognosis,mRS score＞2 was defined as poor prognosis,of which 6 was defined as death.Results(1)There were no significant differences in baseline and clinical data between the tirofiban group and the dual antibody group(all P＞0.05).(2)There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with good outcome(75.2％[185/246]vs.74.2％[66/89],P=0.845)and death(10.2％[25/246]vs.12.4％[11/89],P=0.566)at 180 days after operation between the tirofiban group and the dual antiplatelet group.(3)There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative(0.8％[2/246]vs.4.5％[4/89],P=0.075)and postoperative thrombotic events(11.0％[27/246]vs.13.5％[12/89],P=0.527)between the tirofiban group and the dual antiplatelet group.(4)Results about safety comparison between this two antiplatelet regimens showed that the incidence of early postoperative intracranial hemorrhage were lower in the tirofiban group than that in the dual antiplatelet group(2.8％[7/246]vs.10.1％[9/89],P=0.014).There were no significant differences in the symptomatic external ventricular drainage related intracranial hemorrhage(0 vs.2/15,P=0.050),incidences of intraoperative intracranial hemorrhage(1.6％vs.3.4％,P=0.580),late postoperative intracranial hemorrhage(3.3％vs.4.5％,P=0.836),and drug-related thrombocytopenia(0.4％vs.1.1％,P=0.461)between the two groups.Conclusion Low-dose tirofiban infusion in SAC for ruptured aneurysms may prevent perioperative thromboembolic events without high risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
