Scoping review of home-based self-management behaviors assessment tools in patients with lung transplant
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230912-01028
- VernacularTitle:肺移植患者居家自我管理行为评估工具的范围综述
- Author:
Shan WANG
1
;
Yinghua CAI
;
Haiqin ZHOU
;
Qing ZHAO
;
Xia WAN
;
Yingxiang ZHANG
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学护理学院，南京 211166
- Keywords:
Lung transplantation;
Self-Management behavior;
Home-based nursing;
Assessment tools;
Scoping review
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2024;30(16):2218-2227
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To conduct a scoping review of the characteristics, functions, risk of bias and applications of home-based self-management behavior assessment tools for lung transplant patients, so as to provide references for clinical medical staff to conduct further related research.Methods:The relevant literatures were systematically searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases. The search period was from the establishment of the databases to June 30, 2023. The scoping review method framework was used to screen the literature, extract information and standardize the report.Results:A total of 10 167 Chinese and English literatures were searched, and after deduplication and screening, 23 articles that met the criteria were finally included, involving 13 home-based self-management behavior assessment tools for lung transplant patients, including nine specific tools and four universal tools. There were eight kinds of lung transplantation patients whose reliability and validity were not verified. Of the 13 tools, those with single-dimensional assessments and single measures predominate. The level of home self-management behavior of lung transplant patients was reflected mainly through compliance, and medication management was the most frequently assessed content.Conclusions:At present, the measurement of home-based self-management behavior of lung transplant patients is mainly based on questionnaire surveys, and the evaluation tools are mostly single dimensional. The reliability and validity of most evaluation tools in the population of lung transplant patients are not yet clear, and there is a certain risk of bias. It is recommended that researchers pay attention to the reliability and validity verification report of the evaluation tool in the target population when selecting it, and integrate multiple measurement methods to reduce measurement errors.
