Comparison of efficacies between transforaminal endoscopic decompression and limited decompression and fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis
10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2024.07.04
- VernacularTitle:经椎间孔内镜下减压与有限节段减压融合术治疗成人退行性脊柱侧凸的疗效对比
- Author:
Yao ZHANG
1
;
Wancheng LIN
;
Jipeng SONG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院脊柱外科 100038北京市
- Keywords:
Adult degenerative scoliosis;
Foraminal stenosis;
Lower limb radiculopathy;
Transforaminal endo-scopic decompression
- From:
Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
2024;34(7):695-703
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives:To investigate the characteristics of clinical and imaging outcomes and their differ-ences between transforaminal endoscopic decompression and limited decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis(ADS).Methods:From January 2018 to January 2021,53 patients suf-fering from ADS who underwent surgery in our department were retrospectively analyzed,and they were divid-ed into either minimally invasive surgery(MIS)group(31 patients,underwent transforaminal endoscopic decom-pression)or fusion group(22 patients,underwent limited decompression and fusion surgery).The following data were comparatively analyzed:the baseline characteristics,the preoperative Lenke-Silva level,the radiographical parameters(scoliotic Cobb angle,global spinal balance parameters,and spinopelvic parameters)that measured at preoperation,before discharge,at six months after surgery,and at the final follow-up,clinical outcomes that evaluated at preoperation,before discharge,three months after surgery,six months after surgery,and the final follow-up,the incidence of surgical complications,and the reoperation rate.Results:The mean follow-up period was 15.68±3.26 months.The mean age of the patients in the MIS group was significantly higher than that in the fusion group(78.64±5.19 years vs 64.95±4.31 years,P＜0.05).In the MIS group,the majority of the patients were classified as Lenke-Silva Ⅰ and Ⅱ,and all the patients suffered from unilateral lower limb radiculopathy;In the fusion group,more patients were of Lenke-Silva Ⅱ and Ⅲ levels,and 73％of the patients suffered from unilateral lower limb radiculopathy.The preoperative scoliotic Cobb angle in the MIS group was significantly smaller than that in the fusion group(23.92°±9.06° vs 39.58°±13.12°,P＜0.05).Postop-eratively,both groups of patients showed significantly improvement in back pain,leg pain,and functional dis-ability.At the final follow-up,the scores for back pain and functional disability showed preferably improve-ment in the MIS group than those in the fusion group(P＜0.05).During the postoperative follow-up,no coronal or sagittal imbalance was observed in both groups;At the final follow-up:the mean scoliotic Cobb angle pro-gressed 1.51° in the MIS group,while the correction of scoliosis reduced 1.82° in the fusion group.The op-erative time,intraoperative blood loss,incidence of complications,and the reoperation rate in the MIS group were significantly lower than those in the fusion group(P＜0.05).Conclusions:For ADS patients without rigid imbalance,both surgical interventions are able to significantly improve clinical symptoms.The short-term fol-low-up outcomes reveal that the endoscopic decompression superiors in less scoliosis progression after opera-tion and functional improvement than limited fusion surgery.
