Long-term therapeutic efficacy and prognosis analysis of complex high-risk coronary heart disease patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with intra-aortic balloon pump
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2024.09.004
- VernacularTitle:复杂高危冠心病患者在体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏辅助下行择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的远期疗效及预后结局分析
- Author:
Tian-Tong YU
1
;
Shuai ZHAO
;
Yan CHEN
;
You-Hu CHEN
;
Gen-Rui CHEN
;
Huan WANG
;
Bo-Hui ZHANG
;
Xi ZHANG
;
Bo-Da ZHU
;
Peng HAN
;
Hao-Kao GAO
;
Kun LIAN
;
Cheng-Xiang LI
Author Information
1. 中国人民解放军空军军医大学第一附属医院心血管内科,陕西西安 710032
- Keywords:
Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
Intra-aortic balloon pump;
Major adverse cardiovascular events
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2024;32(9):501-508
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective We aimed to compare the efficacy and prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in complex and high-risk patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)combined with intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP)assistance,and explore the application value of combined use of mechanical circulatory support(MCS)devices in complex PCI.Methods A total of patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent selective PCI supported by MCS at the Department of Cardiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022 were continuously enrolled.According to the mechanical circulatory support method,the patients were divided into ECMO+IABP group and IABP group.Clinical characteristics,angiographic features,in-hospital outcomes,and complications were collected.The intra-hospital outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)at one month and one year after the procedure were observed.The differences and independent risk factors between the two groups in the above indicators were analyzed.Results A total of 218 patients undergoing elective PCI were included,of which 66 patients were in the ECMO+IABP group and 152 patients were in the IABP group.The baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients were generally comparable,but the ECMO+IABP group had more complex lesion characteristics.The proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation(6.1％vs.0.7％,P=0.030),left main disease(43.9％vs.27.0％,P=0.018),triple vessel disease(90.9％vs.75.5％,P=0.009),and RCA chronic total occlusion disease(60.6％vs.35.5％,P＜0.001)was higher in the ECMO+IABP group compared to the IABP group.The proportion of patients with previous PCI history was higher in the IABP group(32.9％vs.16.7％,P=0.014).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of in-hospital complications between the two groups(P=0.176),but the incidence of hypotension after PCI was higher in the ECMO+IABP group(19.7％vs.9.2％,P=0.031).The rates of 1-month MACE(4.5％vs.2.6％,P=0.435)and 1-year MACE(7.6％vs.7.9％,P=0.936)were comparable between the two groups.Multivariate analysis showed that in-hospital cardiac arrest(OR 7.17,95％CI 1.27-40.38,P=0.025)and after procedure hypotension(OR 3.60,95％CI 1.10-11.83,P=0.035)were independent risk factors for the occurrence of 1-year MACE.Conclusions Combination use of ECMO+IABP support can provide complex and high-risk coronary heart disease patients with an opportunity to achieve coronary artery revascularization through PCI,and achieve satisfactory long-term prognosis.
