Status and influencing factors of high-risk foot in inpatients with type 2 diabetes
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20221110-05450
- VernacularTitle:住院2型糖尿病患者高危足发生和分级现状及其影响因素分析
- Author:
Mengyao WEI
1
;
Mengwen LI
;
Binru HAN
;
Qiuping LI
;
Yanqiu WANG
;
Ludan XU
;
Shuao TANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学宣武医院护理部，北京 100053
- Keywords:
Diabetic foot;
Inpatients;
Foot care;
Screening;
Influencing factors
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2023;29(26):3531-3541
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To carry out high-risk foot examination and grading combined with two examination methods for inpatients with type 2 diabetes, and explore the influencing factors of the occurrence and development of high-risk foot, and investigate their foot care behavior status.Methods:From July 2021 to January 2022, 409 patients with diabetes who were admitted to the Department of Endocrinology, Department of Geriatrics, Department of Cardiology, Urology Surgery and Department of Ophthalmology of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University were selected as research subjects by convenience sampling. The General Information Questionnaire, Standardized Process of At-risk Foot Screening and Stratification for Diabetic Patients, InIow's Screening for the High-Risk Diabetic Foot: A 60-Second Tool, and Foot Care Behavior Questionnaire for Diabetic Patients. Single factor analysis and Logistic regression analysis were used to explore the factors influencing the occurrence and development of high-risk foot in type 2 diabetes patients. A total of 409 questionnaires were distributed, and 392 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective response rate of 95.8% (392/409) .Results:Among 392 patients, the detection rate of high-risk diabetic foot (HRDF) was 76.3% (299/392), and the proportion of high-risk foot grade 2 was the largest (193). Age ( OR=1.042, P<0.01) and years of hypertension ( OR=1.030, P<0.05) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of HRDF, with statistically significant differences. Taking the high risk foot grade 3 as a reference, cerebrovascular disease [ OR=16.408, 95% CI (1.323, 203.417) ], diabetes course [ OR=1.066, 95% CI (1.008, 1.128) ], education level in middle school [ OR=0.180, 95% CI (0.056, 0.581) ], education level in primary school and below [ OR=0.126, 95% CI (0.019, 0.841) ] were independent influencing factors for the progress of high risk foot. The foot care behavior of high-risk foot patients with high risk levels was not superior to that of patients with low risk levels. Conclusions:The combination of the two screening methods can meet the examination needs of clinical and nursing medical staff for inpatients with type 2 diabetes. Emphasizing the influencing factors of HRDF occurrence and development can provide reference for early identification of high-risk foot.
