Comparison of the value of three different methods for diagnosing TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ thyroid nodules individually and in combination
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20231113-00421
- VernacularTitle:3种不同方法单独及联合检查对TBSRTC Ⅲ~Ⅴ类甲状腺结节的诊断价值比较
- Author:
Chunhui SHAO
1
;
Junzhi ZHAO
;
Ran XIANG
Author Information
1. 宝鸡市人民医院超声科，宝鸡 721000
- Keywords:
Thyroid nodule;
Carcinoma;
Ultrasonography;
Elasticity imaging techniques;
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration;
Biopsy,needle;
Phlebography
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2024;31(6):811-816
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the value of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), real-time ultrasound elastography (RTE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), individually and in combination, in the diagnosis of TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ thyroid nodules.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 patients with TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ thyroid nodules who were pathologically diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology at Bao Ji People's Hospital between February 2022 and December 2023. All patients were assessed using ACR TI-RADS grading, RTE, and CEUS, with postoperative pathological diagnosis serving as the gold standard. The diagnostic effectiveness of ACR TI-RADS, RTE, and CEUS, individually and in combination, for TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ thyroid nodules was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:There were statistically significant differences in nodule size, blood supply, and proportion of TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ nodule between the two groups ( χ2 = 4.67, 42.56, 26.09, all P < 0.05), while there was no statistical significance in other general data (all P > 0.05). Of the 106 patients with TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ nodules, 69 patients were diagnosed with malignant nodules and 37 with benign nodules. The area under the curve (95% CI) of ACR-TIRADS, RTE, and CEUS in identifying malignant nodules were 0.860 [95% CI (0.779-0.920)], 0.712 [95% CI (0.616-0.796)], and 0.788 [95% CI (0.698-0.862)], respectively, with sensitivities of 85.51%, 66.67%, and 73.91%, respectively and specificities of 86.49%, 75.68%, and 83.78%, respectively. The Youden indices were 0.719, 0.423, and 0.577, respectively. Among the three diagnostic methods, ACR TI-RADS had the highest diagnostic efficiency, while RTE had the lowest. Pairwise comparisons in ROC analysis revealed statistically significant differences between ACR TI-RADS and RTE, ACR TI-RADS and CEUS, as well as RTE and CEUS ( Z = 4.22, 3.02, 2.78, all P < 0.05). The ACR TI-RADS + RTE + CEUS combination had the highest sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and AUC (95% CI) values: 94.20%, 89.19%, 0.834, and 0.917 (95% CI: 0.847-0.962). The RTE + CEUS combination had the lowest values: 76.81%, 78.38%, 0.552, and 0.776 (95% CI: 0.685-0.851). The pairwise comparison results in the ROC curve revealed that significant differences were observed between ACR TI-RADS + RTE and RTE + CEUS, ACR TI-RADS + RTE and ACR TI-RADS + RTE + CEUS, ACR TI-RADS + CEUS and ACR TI-RADS + RTE + CEUS, RTE + CEUS and ACR TI-RADS + RTE + CEUS, and ACR TI-RADS + CEUS and RTE + CEUS ( Z = 3.13, 2.40, 2.16, 4.07, 3.32, all P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between ACR TI-RADS + RTE and ACR TI-RADS + CEUS in ROC analysis ( Z = 0.06, P > 0.05). Conclusion:The combined utilization of ACR TI-RADS, RTE, and CEUS offers enhanced information on thyroid nodules, encompassing malignant risk stratification, nodular elasticity, and contrast agent perfusion, thereby aiding in improving the diagnostic precision of TBSRTC Ⅲ-Ⅴ malignant nodules.
