Effect of personalized nutritional support based on nutritional risk screening on nutritional status and prognosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20230913-00186
- VernacularTitle:基于营养风险筛查的个性化营养支持对炎症性肠病患者营养状态及预后的影响
- Author:
Xutao WU
1
;
Jiandan PAN
;
Lingyan SHI
;
Qiu ZHAO
;
Wenhui QIU
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属第一医院消化科，温州 325000
- Keywords:
Enteral nutrition;
Colitis,ulcerative;
Nutritional support;
Albumins;
Blood sedimentation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2024;31(5):715-721
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of personalized nutritional support based on nutritional risk screening on nutritional status and prognosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Methods:A total of 100 patients with inflammatory bowel disease admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2021 to September 2022 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into control group and observation group according to the random number method. NRS 2002 nutritional risk screening was performed on all patients. The control group was given routine nursing and nutritional support. On this basis, the observation group received patient-centered personalized nutrition support program shared by doctors and patients. The nutritional status, inflammatory indicators and prognosis of the two groups were compared and observed at admission, discharge, 1 month after discharge, and 3 months after discharge.Results:From admission to 3 months after discharge, albumin, prealbumin, nitrogen balance, triceps skinfold thickness in the two groups were significantly increased ( F = 8.43, 14.32, 10.27, 23.41, 7.66, 8.91, 6.84, 8.90, P < 0.05), while the malnutrition inflammation score was significantly decreased ( F = 4.84, 7.42, P < 0.05). Albumin, prealbumin, nitrogen balance, triceps skinfold thickness in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 3 months after discharge ( t = 7.95, 17.43, 6.55, 6.72, P < 0.001), and the malnutrition inflammation score was significantly lower than that of the control group ( t = 6.95, P < 0.001). As treatment progressed, the levels of C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin gradually decreased and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate slowed down in both groups compared with the admission, with statistical significance ( F = 9.03, 11.28, 18.37, 19.20, 32.42, 28.88, P < 0.001). The levels of C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group 3 months after discharge ( t = 8.29, 7.99, 10.34, P < 0.001). Patients in the observation group had good compliance with the formulated diet plan, and no related rejection events occurred. The readmission rate of patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group ( χ2 = 10.18, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Individualized nutrition support programs based on nutritional risk screening can help improve the nutritional status and disease status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
