Effect of umbilical therapy on ulcerative colitis: a systematic evaluation and Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210608-02517
- VernacularTitle:脐疗治疗溃疡性结肠炎效果的系统评价和Meta分析
- Author:
Dan YANG
1
;
Lijiao YAN
;
Qiulu MAI
;
Dou WANG
;
Xiaoyan ZHANG
;
Yufang HAO
;
Hailing GUO
;
Fang WANG
Author Information
1. 北京中医药大学护理学院，北京 102448
- Keywords:
Umbilical therapy;
Traditional Chinese medicine external treatment;
Colitis, ulcerative;
Systematic review;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2022;28(1):32-41
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To systematically evaluate the effect of umbilical therapy in adult ulcerative colitis.Methods:The clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) related to the effect of umbilical therapy in ulcerative colitis in the Chinese and English databases were systematically searched, and their citations were traced. The search time limit was from the establishment of each database to December 30, 2020. Two researchers screened and evaluated the articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and extracted article information and data. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis.Results:A total of 13 Chinese articles were included, with 898 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the general symptom relief rate [ RR=0.70, 95% CI (0.12, 4.19), P=0.70]and effective rate [ RR=0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.59), P=0.86]between conventional therapy and umbilical therapy alone. Umbilical therapy combined with conventional therapy can improve the effective rate of treatment [ RR=1.26, 95% CI (1.18, 1.35), P<0.000 01], general symptom relief rate [ RR=1.94, 95% CI (1.44, 2.61), P<0.000 1], abdominal pain relief rate [ RR=1.90, 95% CI (1.42, 2.54), P<0.000 1], diarrhea relief rate [ RR=1.32, 95% CI (1.07, 1.64), P=0.01], remission rate of pus and blood stool [ RR=1.22, 95% CI (1.03, 1.44), P=0.02]and reduced disease activity [ MD=-1.79, 95% CI (-3.37, -0.21), P=0.03]. In terms of adverse reactions, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant [ RR=0.33, 95% CI (0.08, 0.80), P=0.13]. Conclusions:The efficacy of umbilical therapy alone is equivalent to that of conventional therapy, but umbilical therapy combined with conventional therapy is more effective in improving the treatment effective rate, general symptom relief rate and clinical symptoms. Due to the limitation of the number and quality of the included studies, long-term follow-up, large sample and rigorous RCT studies are needed to prove it.
