Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Regulated Learning Scale in Clinical Nursing Practice
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210610-02572
- VernacularTitle:临床护理实践自我调节学习量表的汉化及信效度检验
- Author:
Qiannan CHEN
1
;
Jie WANG
;
Zhigang QIAN
;
Guifang JIN
;
Xueru ZHANG
Author Information
1. 蚌埠医学院护理学院 233000
- Keywords:
Students, nursing;
Clinical nursing practice;
Self-regulated learning;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(36):5021-5025
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate the English version of the Self-Regulated Learning Scale in Clinical Nursing Practice (SRLS-CNP) into Chinese, and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale.Methods:The Brislin translation model was adopted to translate the scale forward and back to form the Chinese version of SRLS-CNP. The Chinese version of SRLS-CNP was culturally adjusted through cognitive interviews, expert consultations and pre-surveys. From December 2020 to April 2021, convenience sampling was used to select 1 452 nursing undergraduates from 4 undergraduate medical schools in Anhui Province as the research object. The Chinese version of SRLS-CNP was used for investigation to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results:The Chinese version of SRLS-CNP included 2 subscales of motivation and learning strategies, with a total of 16 items. The motivation subscale extracted 2 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 74.709%. The learning strategy subscale extracted 3 common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 76.364%. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.940. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the motivation subscale was 0.875, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension was from 0.850 to 0.867. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the learning strategies subscale was 0.919, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension was from 0.807 to 0.886. The half-reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.882, and the half-reliability coefficients of the motivation and learning strategies subscale were 0.698 and 0.871, respectively. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.936, and the test-retest reliability coefficients of the motivation and learning strategies subscale were 0.857 and 0.832, respectively.Conclusions:The Chinese version of SRLS-CNP has good reliability and validity, and can be used to evaluate the self-regulated learning ability of clinical nursing practice of undergraduate nursing students in China.
