Application of cognitive behavior intervention in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210309-01035
- VernacularTitle:认知行为干预在肘管综合征患者中的应用
- Author:
Baoyue YIN
1
;
Yinling SONG
;
Yang YANG
;
Xin XU
;
Liming PAN
Author Information
1. 吉林大学第一医院手足外科，长春 130000
- Keywords:
Cubital tunnel syndrome;
Cognitive behavioral intervention;
Self-perceived burden;
Medical coping modes
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(36):4964-4969
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the influence of cognitive behavioral intervention on self-perceived burden and coping style of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) , so as to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for the psychological care of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.Methods:Using the convenient sampling method, a total of 84 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who were admitted to the Department of Hand and Foot Surgery of the First Hospital of Jilin University from July 2018 to August 2019 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the intervention group (43 cases) and the control group (41 cases) . The control group was given routine nursing care, while the intervention group was given cognitive behavioral intervention on the basis of the control group. The general situation and injury characteristics questionnaire, Self-Perceived Burden Scale (SPBS) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) were used to compare self-perceived burden and medical response methods of patients in the two groups before and after the intervention.Results:In the end, 42 patients in the intervention group and 40 patients in the control group completed the study. Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in scores of SPBS and MCMQ of patients between the two groups ( P>0.05) . After the intervention, the total score of SPBS and the scores of all dimensions of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . After the intervention, the score of MCMQ face style dimension of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, the score of yielding method dimension was lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . There was no statistically significant difference in the avoidance style dimension scores between the two groups after the intervention ( P>0.05) . Conclusions:Cognitive behavior intervention can effectively reduce self-perceived burden level of the patients and enable them to adopt a positive coping style during the treatment process, which can help recovery of them.
