Construction and practice of remote intervention program for clinical nurses' neck, shoulder and low back pain based on Omaha system
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20210407-01522
- VernacularTitle:基于奥马哈系统的临床护士颈肩腰痛远程干预方案的构建与实践效果
- Author:
Weige SUN
1
;
Zhantao JIAO
;
Ying HE
;
Limei TANG
;
Haijiao ZHANG
;
Xiuwu LI
;
Lei SHI
;
Suzhai TIAN
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第二医院养老中心筹建办公室，石家庄 050000
- Keywords:
Nurses;
Neck pain;
Shoulder pain;
Low back pain;
Omaha system;
Intervention;
Exercise
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(32):4380-4385
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct an Omaha system-based remote intervention program for clinical nurses' neck, shoulder and low back pain and evaluate its effect.Methods:From July to October 2020, 94 nurses with neck, shoulder and low back pain in a Class Ⅲ hospital were randomly selected by ward. Using the envelope method, nurses were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, with 47 cases in each group, among them, the intervention group dropped 1 and the remaining 46 persons, the control group dropped 4 and the remaining 43 persons. The intervention group conducted a remote intervention program (using Omaha system as the theoretical framework, and using literature review, semi-structured interviews and expert consultation to construct a remote intervention program for clinical nurses' neck, shoulder and low back pain) . The control group used conventional guidance. The General Information Questionnaire, Exercise Compliance Questionnaire, Knowledge-Behavior-Symptoms (K-B-S) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the intervention effect.Results:The exercise compliance of nurses in the intervention group was 78.26% (36/46) and that in the control group was 39.53% (17/43) , the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.01) . After 6 weeks of intervention, the nurses' cognitive and behavior scores in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) . There was no statistically significant difference in the symptom score between the two groups ( P>0.05) . The VAS score and frequency of neck, shoulder and low back pain were lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:Based on Omaha system, the remote intervention program for the clinical nurses' neck, shoulder and low back pain is safe, scientific and theoretical. It can improve cognition and behavior of neck, shoulder and low back pain nurses, reduce the intensity and frequency of pain, and the nurses have good compliance.
