Bibliometric analysis of oral motor intervention in premature infants in China from 2010 to 2020
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20201106-06100
- VernacularTitle:2010—2020年我国早产儿口腔运动干预研究的文献计量学分析
- Author:
Qian TANG
1
;
Na ZHANG
;
Yaojia HU
;
Lihui ZHU
Author Information
1. 湖南中医药大学护理学院，长沙 410208
- Keywords:
Infant, premature;
Preterm infants;
Oral motor intervention;
Bibliometrics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(21):2832-2836
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the research and development trends of oral motor intervention in premature infants in China, so as to provide an effective reference for further development of oral motor intervention in premature infants.Methods:Chinese literature on oral motor intervention in premature infants included in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) , WanFang, VIP and China Biology Medicine database were searched by computer from January 2010 to October 2020. Quantitative analysis was carried out using Medical Literature King, Excel 2019 and SPSS 25.0.Results:The number of documents that met the requirements was 303, and the number of documents was on the rise. A total of 224 documents were published from 2013 to 2019, accounting for 73.93% of the total number of documents. Guangdong Province had the largest number of published documents, with 53 articles (17.49%) , followed by Jiangsu with 29 articles (9.57%) . The document fund support rate was 16.17% (49/303) , and the co-author rate was 64.03% (194/303) , and the author's collaboration was 1.96 (595/303) . Among the document types, the number of case-control studies was the largest, with 249 (82.18%) , and the second was review literature, with 32 (10.56%) . The contents of the document research were mainly feeding and growth and development, with 182 articles (60.07%) and 34 articles (11.22%) respectively. The evaluation indicators used were mainly oral feeding time, body weight, hospital stay and milk sucking volume.Conclusions:The overall number of the document is on the rise, and the research efforts continue to increase, but the quality of the document, fund support rate, and evidence-based strength still need to be improved, and the research content needs to be further expanded.
