Chinesization, revision and reliability and validity evaluation of Wilson-Sims Psychiatric Fall Risk Assessment Tool
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200923-05494
- VernacularTitle:Wilson-Sims精神科跌倒风险评估量表的汉化修订及信效度评价
- Author:
Meiqing SHENG
1
;
Wenwen QI
;
Zhongying SHI
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心老年一科，上海 200030
- Keywords:
Psychiatry;
Fall;
Assessment tool;
Chinesization of scale;
Reliability and validity test
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(14):1864-1867
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To Chinesize and revise Wilson-Sims Psychiatric Fall Risk Assessment Tool (WSFRAT) and test its reliability and validity.Methods:According to the modified translation principle for scale of Brislin, WSFRAT-M was formed through expert consultation after the Chinesization of the scale. Using the convenient sampling method, a total of 182 inpatients in Shanghai Mental Health Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine in January 2020 were selected as the research objects. The structural validity, inter-evaluator reliability and predictive reliability of the scale were evaluated.Results:The final WSFRAT-M had 15 items, which were divided into 5 factors through exploratory factor analysis, with a contribution rate of 65.558%. The inter-evaluator reliability of the scale was 0.98. The area under the ROC curve was 0.818. When the segmentation point was 7.5, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 78.4%.Conclusions:The predictive reliability of WSFRAT-M is good, but the structural validity is general. To some extent, WSFRAT-M is worthy of clinical application in psychiatry.
