Application of Chinese version of 19-Item Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Scale in patients after digital replantation and its reliability and validity test
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200820-04988
- VernacularTitle:中文版19条重返工作自我效能量表在断指再植术后患者中的应用及信效度检验
- Author:
Shaomei TAN
1
;
Dongzhen HE
;
Huanxin LIANG
Author Information
1. 广东省佛山市南海区第四人民医院手足外科 528200
- Keywords:
Replantation;
Digital replantation;
Return-to-work;
Self-efficacy;
Chinesization of scale;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2021;27(13):1695-1700
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate 19-Item Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy (RTWSE-19) Scale into Chinese and verify reliability and validity of its application in patients after replantation of severed fingers.Methods:Brislin translation model was used to translate and back-translate RTWSE-19 Scale, and the Chinese version of RTWSE-19 Scale was adjusted through expert evaluation, group discussion and pre-survey. Using the convenient sampling method, a total of 150 patients who were treated and were willing to return to work after replantation of severed fingers in the Fourth People's Hospital of Nanhai District in Foshan, Guangdong Province from March 2019 to February 2020 were selected, and the modified Chinese version of RTWSE-19 Scale was used to investigate. The validity of the scale was evaluated by the content validity of expert evaluation and the structure validity of exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach's α coefficient, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability were used to evaluate the reliability of the scale.Results:A total of 150 questionnaires were distributed, and 141 valid questionnaires were returned. The effective recovery rate was 94.0%. The Chinese version of RTWSE-19 Scale had the same structure as the original scale. The original 19 items were retained, which were divided into three dimensions: coping with work (items 1-7) , work adjustment (items 8-14) and request to colleagues (items 15-19) . The content validity coefficient of the scale was 0.920. Through exploratory factor analysis, 3 common factors with characteristic roots greater than 1 were extracted, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 62.4%. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.903, the test-retest reliability was 0.771 and the half-reliability was 0.763.Conclusions:The Chinese version of RTWSE-19 Scale in this study has good reliability and validity, which is suitable for evaluating the return-to-work self-efficacy of patients after replantation of severed fingers.
