Clinical Application of Different Reinforcement Methods in Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Low Rectal Cancer
10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2024.06.016
- VernacularTitle:不同加固方式在腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中的临床应用
- Author:
Yunpeng LI
1
;
Guowu QIAN
;
Yangyang SONG
Author Information
1. 453000 新乡医学院
- Keywords:
Rectal tumor;
Anastomotic leakage;
Reinforcement suture;
Laparoscopic surgery
- From:
Journal of Medical Research
2024;53(6):75-78
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the safety and effectiveness of different reinforcement methods in laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 215 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer in Nan-yang Central Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.According to the different ways of anastomotic reinforcement,the patients were divided into three groups:transanal reinforcement group(n=63),transabdominal reinforcement group(n=69)and non-reinforcement group(control group,n=83).The perioperative related indexes,postoperative complications(anasto-motic leakage,bleeding,stenosis)and postoperative anorectal function were compared among the three groups.Results The incidence of anastomotic leakage and the number of anastomotic bleeding in the reinforcement group were significantly lower than those in the non-reinforcement group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss,postoperative first exhaust time,hospital stay,anastomotic stenosis and anorectal function,the difference was not statistically signifi-cant(P＞0.05).The incidence of anastomotic stenosis in the transabdominal reinforcement group was significantly higher than that in the transanal reinforcement group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative first exhaust time,hospital stay,incidence of anastomotic leakage,number of anastomotic bleeding and anorectal function between the two groups,the difference were not statistically significant(P＞0.05).Conclusion Transanal reinforcement of low colorectal anastomosis can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications,which is a safe and effective reinforcement method in laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer.
