Reliability and validity analysis of Chinese versions of TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork attitudes questionnaire
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20190812-02878
- VernacularTitle:中文版医疗团队合作认知和态度量表的信效度分析
- Author:
Jie HUANG
1
;
Haiping YU
;
Meiying ZHANG
;
Xingjing YANG
;
Shiwen GONG
;
Jingyi YANG
;
Hui SHI
;
Yanfen GU
;
Yinyu WANG
Author Information
1. 同济大学医学院，上海 200120
- Keywords:
Medical staff;
Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire;
Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2020;26(21):2817-2823
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To conduct reliability and validity test of Chinese versions of TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork attitudes questionnaire so as to evaluate whether they are applicable to the current situation of medical teamwork in China.Methods:From January to April 2019, the Chinese versions of TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire were used to evaluate 900 emergency department workers in 9 ClassⅢGrade A hospitals in Shanghai by cluster sampling, and reliability and validity of the questionnaires were analyzed and evaluated. In this study, a total of 900 questionnaires were issued, 870 were recovered and 861 were valid, with an effective recovery rate of 96%.Results:The exploratory factor analysis of the Chinese versions of Chinese versions of TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork attitudes questionnaire was carried out to extract the five dimensions of team structure, leadership, situation monitoring, mutual assistance and communication. The cumulative variance contribution rates were respectively 71.248% and 71.010%. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the questionnaires. The Chi-square degrees of freedom ratio (χ 2/ df) values were 2.870 and 2.214, normed fitting index ( NFI) values were 0.861 and 0.906, Tucker-Lewis index values were 0.896 and 0.940, incremental fit index ( IFI) values were 0.905 and 0.946, comparative fit index (CFI) values were 0.904 and 0.946, and root mean square error of approximation ( RMSEA) values were 0.066 and 0.053. The fitting values all reached the judgment standard, and the structural validity of the two questionnaires was good. The content validity indexes were good and they were respectively 0.94 and 0.95. The overall Cronbach's α coefficients of TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork attitudes questionnaire were respectively 0.949 and 0.938, the split-half reliability was respectively 0.848 and 0.959, and the test retest reliability were respectively 0.959 and 0.964. Conclusions:The Chinese versions of TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork perceptions questionnaire and TeamSTEPPS medical teamwork attitudes questionnaire have good reliability and validity and high applicability, which can be used to measure the attitude and perceptions of medical teamwork in China.
