Effects of toilet-type smart fumigator on patients with anal edema after anal surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20191107-04044
- VernacularTitle:坐便式智能熏洗机在肛门术后肛门水肿患者中的应用效果
- Author:
Xiujun GUO
1
;
Yuanyuan LIU
;
Qiong WU
;
Xiaoye ZHU
;
Zhuangshuang LI
Author Information
1. 南京中医药大学附属南京中医院护理部 210000
- Keywords:
Hemorrhoids;
Anal edema;
Traditional Chinese Medicine fumigation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2020;26(20):2800-2803
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effects of toilet-type smart fumigator on patients with anal edema after anal surgery.Methods:To tally 70 patients with anal edema after anal surgery in the Department of Proctology at Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine between April and July 2019 were selected by convenient sampling, and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 35 patients in each group. Patients in the observation group received Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) fumigation with a toilet-type smart fumigator, while patients in the control group received TCM fumigation with an ordinary bidet. After TCM fumigation, both groups were routinely treated with microwave. The efficacy, VAS score, perianal swelling score, and patient comfort score of the two groups were compared.Results:After intervention, the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.1% (34/35) , higher than that 74.3% (26/35) in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05) ; the VAS score of the observation group was (2.03±0.86) , lower than that (2.46±0.85) of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05) ; the perianal swelling score of the observation group was (0.29±0.46) , lower than that (0.57±0.50) in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05) ; the comfort score of the observation group was (1.94±0.54) , lower than that (2.26±0.56) in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:The effect of the toilet-type smart fumigator for TCM fumigation on patients with anal edema after anal surgery is better than the ordinary bidet, which can effectively relieve the patient's pain and edema, extend their comfort, and improve their prognosis.
